CAJ | 학술논문

以第二军医大学为例，应用自制问卷，调查研究生导师对研究生创新能力的水平、最能体现研究生创新能力的指标以及每一指标包含内容的具体看法，为完善研究生创新能力评价、提高研究生培养质量提供依据。结果显示，导师对研究生创新能力的评价主要为一般(67.5%)，认为体现研究生创新能力的指标最重要的是科研获奖和专利、发表论文；学生与导师的互动被认为是最能影响科研获奖与专利的指标(35%)；导师被认为是影响学位论文质量最主要的因素(68.6%)；导师认为研究生发表论文应当少而精(53.7%)。
이제이군의대학위례，응용자제문권，조사연구생도사대연구생창신능력적수평、최능체현연구생창신능력적지표이급매일지표포함내용적구체간법，위완선연구생창신능력평개、제고연구생배양질량제공의거。결과현시，도사대연구생창신능력적평개주요위일반(67.5%)，인위체현연구생창신능력적지표최중요적시과연획장화전리、발표논문；학생여도사적호동피인위시최능영향과연획장여전리적지표(35%)；도사피인위시영향학위논문질량최주요적인소(68.6%)；도사인위연구생발표논문응당소이정(53.7%)。
Taking Second Military Medical University for example, this article surveyed the opinions of the tutors with self-made questionnaire on the innovation ability level of graduates, the best indicators of their innovation abilities, and the contents of individual indicator, aiming to provide references for further perfecting the innovation ability evaluation of the graduates and enhancing their culti-vation quality. The results showed that the tutors generally thought the innovation ability of the graduate students were ordinary (67. 5%), that the best indicators were scientific research awards, patents, and published papers, that the interaction between students and tutors was the most important index to awards and patents(35%),and that tutors were the most important factor affecting papers quality(68. 6%). Also they thought the papers should be smaller in quantity and better in quality (53. 7%).