实用放射学杂志
實用放射學雜誌
실용방사학잡지
JOURNAL OF PRACTICAL RADIOLOGY
2015年
1期
113-115,120
,共4页
满玉琳%郭佑民%刘晓斌%孙青%王莹
滿玉琳%郭祐民%劉曉斌%孫青%王瑩
만옥림%곽우민%류효빈%손청%왕형
磁共振成像%关节镜%关节软骨%膝%缺损面积
磁共振成像%關節鏡%關節軟骨%膝%缺損麵積
자공진성상%관절경%관절연골%슬%결손면적
magnetic resonance imaging%arthroscopy%articular cartilage%the knee%defect area
目的:探讨磁共振成像(MRI)与关节镜测量膝关节软骨缺损面积的一致性。方法选取36例(36膝)因膝关节软骨缺损的入院患者,对照分析其关节镜及术前 MRI 资料。比较 MRI 与关节镜术中测量软骨缺损区面积的一致性。结果MRI 与关节镜均发现膝关节软骨缺损92处,平均每例2.6处。经 MRI 测量,平均每膝的软骨缺损面积为(1.9±1.5)cm2;经关节镜测量,平均每膝的软骨缺损面积为(2.9±2.6)cm2;MRI 与关节镜测量结果之间差异有统计学意义(P <0.001)。MRI 的评估结果低于关节镜测量结果,平均差值为(1.7±1.1)cm2。MRI 测量的面积为关节镜测量结果的70.1%。结论MRI 诊断关节软骨缺损病灶数目上与关节镜具有良好的一致性;可直接或间接反映膝关节软骨缺损面积,定位、定性诊断较为准确。
目的:探討磁共振成像(MRI)與關節鏡測量膝關節軟骨缺損麵積的一緻性。方法選取36例(36膝)因膝關節軟骨缺損的入院患者,對照分析其關節鏡及術前 MRI 資料。比較 MRI 與關節鏡術中測量軟骨缺損區麵積的一緻性。結果MRI 與關節鏡均髮現膝關節軟骨缺損92處,平均每例2.6處。經 MRI 測量,平均每膝的軟骨缺損麵積為(1.9±1.5)cm2;經關節鏡測量,平均每膝的軟骨缺損麵積為(2.9±2.6)cm2;MRI 與關節鏡測量結果之間差異有統計學意義(P <0.001)。MRI 的評估結果低于關節鏡測量結果,平均差值為(1.7±1.1)cm2。MRI 測量的麵積為關節鏡測量結果的70.1%。結論MRI 診斷關節軟骨缺損病竈數目上與關節鏡具有良好的一緻性;可直接或間接反映膝關節軟骨缺損麵積,定位、定性診斷較為準確。
목적:탐토자공진성상(MRI)여관절경측량슬관절연골결손면적적일치성。방법선취36례(36슬)인슬관절연골결손적입원환자,대조분석기관절경급술전 MRI 자료。비교 MRI 여관절경술중측량연골결손구면적적일치성。결과MRI 여관절경균발현슬관절연골결손92처,평균매례2.6처。경 MRI 측량,평균매슬적연골결손면적위(1.9±1.5)cm2;경관절경측량,평균매슬적연골결손면적위(2.9±2.6)cm2;MRI 여관절경측량결과지간차이유통계학의의(P <0.001)。MRI 적평고결과저우관절경측량결과,평균차치위(1.7±1.1)cm2。MRI 측량적면적위관절경측량결과적70.1%。결론MRI 진단관절연골결손병조수목상여관절경구유량호적일치성;가직접혹간접반영슬관절연골결손면적,정위、정성진단교위준학。
Objective To explore the consistency of knee articular cartilage defect area by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)and arthroscopy.Methods Thirty-six patients (36 knees)with knee cartilage lesions were collected in our study.The defect area meas-urement of knee articular cartilage by MRI and arthroscopy was compared.Results A total of 92 lesions were detected by both MRI and arthroscopy with an average of 2.6 defects per knee.Preoperative MRI resultes demonstrated the mean defect area per knee was (1.9±1.5)cm2 ,while arthroscopic measurement after debridement indicated the mean defect area per knee was (2.9±2.6)cm2 , which had significant difference(P <0.001).The area measured by MRI was less than that by arthroscopy,and the mean difference was (1.7 ± 1.1)cm2 .The mean area measured by MRI was 70.1% of that by arthroscopy.Conclusion Arthroscopy and MR have good consistency in the number of articular cartilage defect lesions .MRI can reflect the knee articular cartilage defect area directly or indirectly,and be capable of accurate positioning and qualitative diagnosis.