CAJ | 학술논문

不满意于伍德式的“马克思正义观”，英美学者提出了三种不同的阐释方式：(1)马克思不仅有唯物史观上的正义观，而且有价值观上的正义观；(2)马克思批评的是意识形态的正义，信奉的是非意识形态的正义；(3)从人的需要的视角来探索马克思的正义观，乃至马克思主义的正义观。这三种不同的诠释方式虽然都具有各自的解释力，但也各自存在着一些理论难点：第一种方式在正义问题上陷马克思于“似是而非”的理论境地；第二种方式指认马克思具有非意识形态的正义观缺乏有力的文本支持；第三种方式已有的论者语焉不详，文本支持也不是特别充足。不过，相比较而言，第三种方式却是富有理论前景的阐释方式，它不仅合乎历史唯物主义的内在理路，而且创造性地吸纳了其他阐释方式的一些优点。
불만의우오덕식적“마극사정의관”，영미학자제출료삼충불동적천석방식：(1)마극사불부유유물사관상적정의관，이차유개치관상적정의관；(2)마극사비평적시의식형태적정의，신봉적시비의식형태적정의；(3)종인적수요적시각래탐색마극사적정의관，내지마극사주의적정의관。저삼충불동적전석방식수연도구유각자적해석력，단야각자존재착일사이론난점：제일충방식재정의문제상함마극사우“사시이비”적이론경지；제이충방식지인마극사구유비의식형태적정의관결핍유력적문본지지；제삼충방식이유적론자어언불상，문본지지야불시특별충족。불과，상비교이언，제삼충방식각시부유이론전경적천석방식，타불부합호역사유물주의적내재리로，이차창조성지흡납료기타천석방식적일사우점。
Disagreeing with Allen Wood?s views on “Marx?s concept of j ustice”,British and American scholars come up with another three types of interpretations:(1 )In addition to his concept of j ustice based on historical materialism,Marx also had the concept of justice as value;(2)Marx criticized the justice as ideology,and uphold non-ideological justice;(3)According to Marx?s theory of needs,de-veloping Marx?s concept of j ustice,and even more a theory of j ustice of Marxism.Though these three different types of interpretation are explanatory in their own way,they all have some theoretical diffi-culties:the first one puts Marx into a “paradox”on j ustice issues;the second lacks powerful textual support in asserting that Marx upholds the non-ideological j ustice;the third one,which has some vagueness in theoretical interpretation, also lacks in sufficient textual support.Comparatively speaking,the paper holds that the third kind of interpretation is full of theoretical prospect in that it is not only in accordance with Marx?s historical materialism,but is also capable of creatively absorbing some advantages of other interpretations.