齐齐哈尔医学院学报
齊齊哈爾醫學院學報
제제합이의학원학보
JOURNAL OF QIQIHAR MEDICAL COLLEGE
2015年
4期
486-487
,共2页
胃肠道穿孔%气腹%多层螺旋CT%数字化X线摄影
胃腸道穿孔%氣腹%多層螺鏇CT%數字化X線攝影
위장도천공%기복%다층라선CT%수자화X선섭영
Gastrointestinal perforation%Pneumoperitoneum%Multislice spiral CT%Digital X-ray radiography
目的:探讨多层螺旋CT( MSCT)应用于胃肠道穿孔诊断中的临床价值。方法回顾性分析55例经临床手术证实的胃肠道穿孔患者的病历资料,术前均行数字化X线摄影( DR)与MSCT检查,以手术病检结果为金标准,对比分析DR与MSCT的检查结果。结果共55例胃肠道穿孔患者(其中:胃窦穿孔14例,十二指肠球部前壁穿孔21例,空肠5例,回肠10例,阑尾3例,乙状结肠2例)。 MSCT检出腹腔游离气体54例,准确率约为98.2%,而DR检出腹腔游离气体31例,检出率约为56.4%,两种检查方法之间的差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);MSCT准确判定穿孔部位44例,准确率约为80.0%,而DR未能够提示穿孔部位,两种检查方法之间的差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 MSCT技术在胃肠道穿孔的诊断中相较于DR技术,具有极高的准确率,能正确显示大致穿孔部位,对临床治疗有很大的指导意义。
目的:探討多層螺鏇CT( MSCT)應用于胃腸道穿孔診斷中的臨床價值。方法迴顧性分析55例經臨床手術證實的胃腸道穿孔患者的病歷資料,術前均行數字化X線攝影( DR)與MSCT檢查,以手術病檢結果為金標準,對比分析DR與MSCT的檢查結果。結果共55例胃腸道穿孔患者(其中:胃竇穿孔14例,十二指腸毬部前壁穿孔21例,空腸5例,迴腸10例,闌尾3例,乙狀結腸2例)。 MSCT檢齣腹腔遊離氣體54例,準確率約為98.2%,而DR檢齣腹腔遊離氣體31例,檢齣率約為56.4%,兩種檢查方法之間的差異具有統計學意義(P<0.05);MSCT準確判定穿孔部位44例,準確率約為80.0%,而DR未能夠提示穿孔部位,兩種檢查方法之間的差異具有統計學意義(P<0.05)。結論 MSCT技術在胃腸道穿孔的診斷中相較于DR技術,具有極高的準確率,能正確顯示大緻穿孔部位,對臨床治療有很大的指導意義。
목적:탐토다층라선CT( MSCT)응용우위장도천공진단중적림상개치。방법회고성분석55례경림상수술증실적위장도천공환자적병력자료,술전균행수자화X선섭영( DR)여MSCT검사,이수술병검결과위금표준,대비분석DR여MSCT적검사결과。결과공55례위장도천공환자(기중:위두천공14례,십이지장구부전벽천공21례,공장5례,회장10례,란미3례,을상결장2례)。 MSCT검출복강유리기체54례,준학솔약위98.2%,이DR검출복강유리기체31례,검출솔약위56.4%,량충검사방법지간적차이구유통계학의의(P<0.05);MSCT준학판정천공부위44례,준학솔약위80.0%,이DR미능구제시천공부위,량충검사방법지간적차이구유통계학의의(P<0.05)。결론 MSCT기술재위장도천공적진단중상교우DR기술,구유겁고적준학솔,능정학현시대치천공부위,대림상치료유흔대적지도의의。
Objective To explore the clinical value of multislice spiral CT in the diagnosis of gastrointestinal perforation .Methods A retrospective analysis of 55 cases of surgically confirmed by clinical gastrointestinal perforation in patients with medical records , underwent preoperative digital X-ray radiography ( DR) and MSCT examination to surgery-pathological examination results as the gold standard , comparative analysis of DR inspection and MSCT check the results .Results A total of 55 cases of gastrointestinal perforation in patients ( including:14 cases of gastric antrum , 21 cases of duodenal anterior , five cases of jejunum section 10 cases of ileal , three cases of appendix section 2 cases of sigmoid department ) .MSCT detected 54 cases of intraperitoneal free gas , the accuracy rate of about 98.2 %, while the DR detection of intraperitoneal free gas 31 cases, the detection rate of about 56.4%, the difference between the two methods was statistically significant (P<0.05);MSCT accurately determine the perforation site in 44 cases, the accuracy rate of about 80.0 %, while DR has failed to prompt perforation site , the difference between the two methods was statistically significant (P<0.05).Conclusions In the diagnosis of gastrointestinal perforation , MSCT technology compared to DR technology , with high accuracy , can display the approximate site of the perforation is correct , there is a lot of clinical significance .