CAJ | 학술논문

目的：探讨普通电极与球囊漂浮电极在临时起搏应用中的临床差异。方法选择2006年1月至2014年6月我院收治的因缓慢性心律失常行临时起搏治疗的患者，共312例。其中，男160例，女152例，年龄24～93岁，平均（62±8．5）岁。根据植入临时电极不同，分成两组，普通电极组和漂浮电极组。对比两组电极操作时间、以及所测试的起搏参数（阈值、感知）、电极起搏位置和电极移位发生率。结果球囊漂浮电极组与普通电极组比较，起搏参数包括阈值、感知以及电极移位发生率未见明显统计学差异，P＞0．05。然而电极操作时间和电极到位率比较，差异具有统计学意义，P＜0．05。结论球囊漂浮电极与普通电极比较，具有相同的起搏的阈值、感知和电极移位发生率，以及相近的电极操作时间。为临床安全有效的临时起搏治疗方法。
목적：탐토보통전겁여구낭표부전겁재림시기박응용중적림상차이。방법선택2006년1월지2014년6월아원수치적인완만성심률실상행림시기박치료적환자，공312례。기중，남160례，녀152례，년령24～93세，평균（62±8．5）세。근거식입림시전겁불동，분성량조，보통전겁조화표부전겁조。대비량조전겁조작시간、이급소측시적기박삼수（역치、감지）、전겁기박위치화전겁이위발생솔。결과구낭표부전겁조여보통전겁조비교，기박삼수포괄역치、감지이급전겁이위발생솔미견명현통계학차이，P＞0．05。연이전겁조작시간화전겁도위솔비교，차이구유통계학의의，P＜0．05。결론구낭표부전겁여보통전겁비교，구유상동적기박적역치、감지화전겁이위발생솔，이급상근적전겁조작시간。위림상안전유효적림시기박치료방법。
Objective To investigate the clinical differences between a common electrode and a balloon floating in the application of temporary pacing electrode .Methods From 2006 January to 2014 June admitted to our hospital because of slow arrhythmia for temporary pacing in patients , a total of 312 cases.Among them, male 160 cases, female 152 cases, age 24~93 years old (62 ±8.5).According to the different temporary electrode implantation , divided into two groups , the common electrode group and a floating electrode group .Comparison of two groups of electrode operation time , and test the pacing parameters (threshold, perception), pacing electrode position and electrode displacement incidence .Results The balloon tipped floating electrode group and a common electrode groups , pacing parameters including threshold , perception , and electrode displacement incidence rate of non-significant difference, P>0.05.However, the electrode operation time and electrode in place rate comparison, with statistically significant difference , P<0.05.Conclusions Balloon floating electrode and the common electrode ball , with the same pacing threshold , perception and electrode displacement incidence , and similar electrodeoperating time , for temporary pacing clinical safe and effective treatment method .