东南国防医药
東南國防醫藥
동남국방의약
JOURNAL OF SOUTHEAST CHINA NATIONAL DEFENCE MEDICAL SCIENCE
2015年
1期
38-39,60
,共3页
结直肠肿瘤%药物疗法%雷替曲塞
結直腸腫瘤%藥物療法%雷替麯塞
결직장종류%약물요법%뢰체곡새
colorectal cancer%drug therapy%raltitrexed
目的:探讨雷替曲塞以腹腔/静脉给药途径治疗结直肠癌腹水的疗效。方法经病理或细胞学确诊的50例晚期结直肠癌腹水患者分为观察组( n=25)和对照组( n=25)。观察组方案:雷替曲塞3 mg/m2腹腔灌注,奥沙利铂120 mg/m2静滴。对照组方案:雷替曲塞3 mg/m2静滴,奥沙利铂120 mg/m2静滴。两方案均3周为1周期,每周期评价不良反应,每3个周期评价疗效,直至疾病进展或毒性不能耐受,最多治疗12个周期,比较两组的有效率( RR)、疾病控制率( DCR)、中位肿瘤进展时间(mTTP)及不良反应发生率。结果两组RR分别为20%和8%(P<0.05),DCR分别为92%和84%(P>0.05)及mTTP分别为4.5个月和3.6个月(P<0.05)。观察组1、2级丙氨酸氨基转移酶(ALT)和天冬氨酸氨基转移酶(AST)升高发生率为4%,对照组为24%(P<0.05);对照组1、2级中性粒细胞减少、口腔黏膜炎的发生率(分别为48%与32%),均高于观察组(20%与8%)(P<0.05)。结论雷替曲塞腹腔给药疗效优于静脉给药,不良反应更轻,可以作为结直肠癌晚期腹水的有效姑息治疗方案。
目的:探討雷替麯塞以腹腔/靜脈給藥途徑治療結直腸癌腹水的療效。方法經病理或細胞學確診的50例晚期結直腸癌腹水患者分為觀察組( n=25)和對照組( n=25)。觀察組方案:雷替麯塞3 mg/m2腹腔灌註,奧沙利鉑120 mg/m2靜滴。對照組方案:雷替麯塞3 mg/m2靜滴,奧沙利鉑120 mg/m2靜滴。兩方案均3週為1週期,每週期評價不良反應,每3箇週期評價療效,直至疾病進展或毒性不能耐受,最多治療12箇週期,比較兩組的有效率( RR)、疾病控製率( DCR)、中位腫瘤進展時間(mTTP)及不良反應髮生率。結果兩組RR分彆為20%和8%(P<0.05),DCR分彆為92%和84%(P>0.05)及mTTP分彆為4.5箇月和3.6箇月(P<0.05)。觀察組1、2級丙氨痠氨基轉移酶(ALT)和天鼕氨痠氨基轉移酶(AST)升高髮生率為4%,對照組為24%(P<0.05);對照組1、2級中性粒細胞減少、口腔黏膜炎的髮生率(分彆為48%與32%),均高于觀察組(20%與8%)(P<0.05)。結論雷替麯塞腹腔給藥療效優于靜脈給藥,不良反應更輕,可以作為結直腸癌晚期腹水的有效姑息治療方案。
목적:탐토뢰체곡새이복강/정맥급약도경치료결직장암복수적료효。방법경병리혹세포학학진적50례만기결직장암복수환자분위관찰조( n=25)화대조조( n=25)。관찰조방안:뢰체곡새3 mg/m2복강관주,오사리박120 mg/m2정적。대조조방안:뢰체곡새3 mg/m2정적,오사리박120 mg/m2정적。량방안균3주위1주기,매주기평개불량반응,매3개주기평개료효,직지질병진전혹독성불능내수,최다치료12개주기,비교량조적유효솔( RR)、질병공제솔( DCR)、중위종류진전시간(mTTP)급불량반응발생솔。결과량조RR분별위20%화8%(P<0.05),DCR분별위92%화84%(P>0.05)급mTTP분별위4.5개월화3.6개월(P<0.05)。관찰조1、2급병안산안기전이매(ALT)화천동안산안기전이매(AST)승고발생솔위4%,대조조위24%(P<0.05);대조조1、2급중성립세포감소、구강점막염적발생솔(분별위48%여32%),균고우관찰조(20%여8%)(P<0.05)。결론뢰체곡새복강급약료효우우정맥급약,불량반응경경,가이작위결직장암만기복수적유효고식치료방안。
Objective To investigate the effect in peritoneal/intravenous route of administration for the treatment of colorectal cancer ascites by raltitrexed .Methods There were histologically or cytologically diagnosed 50 cases of advanced colorectal cancer pa-tients with ascites , which were divided into the trial group ( n=25 ) and the control group ( n=25 ) .The trial group: raltitrexed 3 mg/m2 intraperitoneal perfusion , oxaliplatin intravenous infusion of 120 mg/m2 , the first day.The control group: raltitrexed intrave-nous infusion of 3 mg/m2 .Oxaliplatin intravenous infusion of 120 mg/m2 , the first day.The two group were 3 weeks for 1 cycles, and toxicity and curative effect were evaluated every cycle and every 3 cycles until disease progression or intolerant toxicity .The maximum was 12 cycles of treatment .To compared response rate ( RR) , disease control rate ( DCR) , the median progression ( mTTP) and ad-verse effects rate of two groups.Results RR of two groups was 20%and 8%(P<0.05), DCR was 92%and 84%(P>0.05) and mTTP was 4.5 months and 3.6 months (P<0.05).1, 2 level incidence of ALT (alanine aminotransferase) and AST (aspartate ami-notransferase ) of the trial group was 4%, lower than 24%of the control group ( P<0.05);1, 2 level neutropenia and mucositis inci-dence rates of the control group were 48%and 32%,the rates of the trial group were 20%and 8%,the rates of the control group were higher than that of the trial group (P<0.05).Conclusion The effect of raltitrexed celiac injection was better than intravenous ad-ministration , and toxicity was lighter , so it can be used as an effective palliative treatment options for metastatic colorectal cancer in ad -vanced ascites .