山西大同大学学报（自然科学版）
山西大同大學學報（自然科學版）
산서대동대학학보（자연과학판）
JOURNAL OF SHANXI DATONG UNIVERSITY(NATURAL SCIENCE EDITION)
2015年
1期
33-35
,共3页
下颌中位近中水平阻生智齿%年轻患者%高速涡轮机%微创拔牙刀
下頜中位近中水平阻生智齒%年輕患者%高速渦輪機%微創拔牙刀
하합중위근중수평조생지치%년경환자%고속와륜궤%미창발아도
medial mesial horizontal impacted wisdom teeth of mandible%young patients%high speed turbine drill%original lux-ator tooth instruments
目的：观察在下颌中位近中水平阻生智齿拔除术中应用高速涡轮机、微创拔牙刀的优越性。方法选择因下颌中位近中水平阻生智齿导致下前牙牙列拥挤错位的年轻正畸患牙（者）80例，随机分成2组，研究组和对照组各40例。研究组拔牙器械采用高速涡轮牙钻和微创拔牙刀，对照组采用常规拔牙器械，记录术中牙齿拔除术所需时间、术中及术后7 d复诊时患者的症状。结果研究组平均拔牙时间15.1 min，对照组平均拔牙时间32.5 min，研究组平均拔牙时间明显少于对照组，术中、术后反应及满意度调查中研究组明显高于对照组。结论高速涡轮牙钻和微创拔牙刀在年轻患者下颌中位近中水平阻生智齿拔除术时具有明显优势。
目的：觀察在下頜中位近中水平阻生智齒拔除術中應用高速渦輪機、微創拔牙刀的優越性。方法選擇因下頜中位近中水平阻生智齒導緻下前牙牙列擁擠錯位的年輕正畸患牙（者）80例，隨機分成2組，研究組和對照組各40例。研究組拔牙器械採用高速渦輪牙鑽和微創拔牙刀，對照組採用常規拔牙器械，記錄術中牙齒拔除術所需時間、術中及術後7 d複診時患者的癥狀。結果研究組平均拔牙時間15.1 min，對照組平均拔牙時間32.5 min，研究組平均拔牙時間明顯少于對照組，術中、術後反應及滿意度調查中研究組明顯高于對照組。結論高速渦輪牙鑽和微創拔牙刀在年輕患者下頜中位近中水平阻生智齒拔除術時具有明顯優勢。
목적：관찰재하합중위근중수평조생지치발제술중응용고속와륜궤、미창발아도적우월성。방법선택인하합중위근중수평조생지치도치하전아아렬옹제착위적년경정기환아（자）80례，수궤분성2조，연구조화대조조각40례。연구조발아기계채용고속와륜아찬화미창발아도，대조조채용상규발아기계，기록술중아치발제술소수시간、술중급술후7 d복진시환자적증상。결과연구조평균발아시간15.1 min，대조조평균발아시간32.5 min，연구조평균발아시간명현소우대조조，술중、술후반응급만의도조사중연구조명현고우대조조。결론고속와륜아찬화미창발아도재년경환자하합중위근중수평조생지치발제술시구유명현우세。
Objective To shorten the tooth extraction time and reduce the postoperative complications, observe the advantage of ap?plication of high-speed turbine drills and original luxator tooth instruments in extraction of medial mesial horizontal impacted wisdom teeth of mandible. Method 80 cases of young orthodontic patients with the lower anterior teeth crowded dislocation caused by medial mesial horizontal impacted wisdom teeth of mandible are screened out during 3 years from March 2009 to March 2012, and randomly di?vided into two groups, study group and control group of 40 cases respectively. The study group adopts high-speed turbine drill and orig?inal luxator tooth instrument, while the control group adopts conventional extraction equipments (tooth forceps, chisel, hammer), then re?cord the extraction time, the patient's intraoperative and postoperative symptoms after seven days when referral. Results The average extraction time of the study group is 15 min, while the control group 32.5 min. The average extraction time of the study group is signifi?cantly less than that of the control group. As for intraoperative and postoperative reaction and patients’satisfaction survey, the study group were significantly higher than those in control group. Conclusion High-speed turbine drills and original luxator tooth instru?ments have obvious advantages in extraction of medial mesial horizontal impacted wisdom teeth of mandible for young patients.
