泸州医学院学报
瀘州醫學院學報
로주의학원학보
JOURNAL OF LUZHOU MEDICAL COLLEGE
2015年
2期
193-195
,共3页
高压冲洗%急诊%污染创面%清创机
高壓遲洗%急診%汙染創麵%清創機
고압충세%급진%오염창면%청창궤
High pressure washing%Emergency%Pollution wound%Debridement machine
目的::观察高压冲洗在急诊污染创面清创术中的的临床疗效。方法:将2012年6月至2014年6月皮肤软组织挫裂伤患者100例,随机分为对照组和观察组,每组50例。观察组采用0.9%生理盐水高压冲洗创面,对照组采用0.9%生理盐水行普通冲洗创面清洗创面后两组均行常规消毒清创治疗;比较创面清洗的时间,创面愈合时间以及创面感染率情况。结果:与对照组比较,观察组清洗的时间及创面愈合时间明显缩短,细菌感染率明显减少(P<0.05)。结论:高压冲洗能有效的清除污染创面中的微小颗粒,减少伤口的细菌,降低伤口的感染率。
目的::觀察高壓遲洗在急診汙染創麵清創術中的的臨床療效。方法:將2012年6月至2014年6月皮膚軟組織挫裂傷患者100例,隨機分為對照組和觀察組,每組50例。觀察組採用0.9%生理鹽水高壓遲洗創麵,對照組採用0.9%生理鹽水行普通遲洗創麵清洗創麵後兩組均行常規消毒清創治療;比較創麵清洗的時間,創麵愈閤時間以及創麵感染率情況。結果:與對照組比較,觀察組清洗的時間及創麵愈閤時間明顯縮短,細菌感染率明顯減少(P<0.05)。結論:高壓遲洗能有效的清除汙染創麵中的微小顆粒,減少傷口的細菌,降低傷口的感染率。
목적::관찰고압충세재급진오염창면청창술중적적림상료효。방법:장2012년6월지2014년6월피부연조직좌렬상환자100례,수궤분위대조조화관찰조,매조50례。관찰조채용0.9%생리염수고압충세창면,대조조채용0.9%생리염수행보통충세창면청세창면후량조균행상규소독청창치료;비교창면청세적시간,창면유합시간이급창면감염솔정황。결과:여대조조비교,관찰조청세적시간급창면유합시간명현축단,세균감염솔명현감소(P<0.05)。결론:고압충세능유효적청제오염창면중적미소과립,감소상구적세균,강저상구적감염솔。
Objective: To observe the clinical effect of high pressure washing on contaminated wounds in emergency. Methods: 100 cases of laceration and contusion of skin tissue from June 2012 to June 2014, were randomly divided into observation group and control group (50 cases each), high pressure and normal pressure 0.9%normal saline was used to wash wound respectively and then patients underwent disinfection of debridement therapy.The wound cleaning time, wound healing time and wound infection rate were compared. Results: Wound cleaning time, wound healing time and wound infection rate were significantly shortened in observation group. Conclusion: High pressure washing can efficiently eliminate small particles in the pollution wound, reduce bacteria of the wound, and decrease the wound infection rate.