山西医药杂志
山西醫藥雜誌
산서의약잡지
SHANXI MEDICAL JOURNAL
2015年
8期
858-861
,共4页
贺艳光%仇燕%郭晓丽%刘力亚%张建国
賀豔光%仇燕%郭曉麗%劉力亞%張建國
하염광%구연%곽효려%류력아%장건국
肾小球滤过率%肾功能不全 ,慢性%附睾分泌蛋白类
腎小毬濾過率%腎功能不全 ,慢性%附睪分泌蛋白類
신소구려과솔%신공능불전 ,만성%부고분비단백류
Glomerular filtration rate%Renal insufficiency,Chronic%Epididymal secretory proteins
目的:比较不同分期的慢性肾脏病(CKD)患者血清人附睾分泌蛋白4(HE4)、血清半胱氨酸蛋白酶抑制剂 C(Cystatin C)和血清肌酐(Scr)的符合率,研究 CKD 患者血清 HE4与估算的肾小球滤过率(eGFR)的相关性。方法分别采用电化学发光法、颗粒增强免疫透射比浊法、肌氨酸氧化酶法检测136例 CKD 患者和67名健康对照组的血清 HE4、血清 Cystatin C 和血清 Scr 水平,比较血清 HE4与 eGFR 、血清 Cystatin C 和血清Scr 水平的相关性,分析血清 HE4、血清 Cystatin C 和血清 Scr 水平在 CKD 不同分期患者间的水平差异和不同分期内血清 HE4、血清 Cystatin C 和血清 Scr 的异常率。结果血清 HE4浓度与 eGFR 呈负相关( r =-0?7033, P <0?05);血清 HE4浓度与血清 Cystatin C 浓度呈正相关(r=0?8719,P<0?05),血清 HE4浓度与血清 Scr 浓度呈正相关( r =0?8489,P <0?05)。 CKD 患者血清 HE4、血清 Cystatin C 和血清 Scr 水平随着 CKD 病情的加重显著升高,血清 HE4、血清 Cystatin C 和血清 Scr 平均水平在各期间的差异均有统计学意义( P <0?05)。在CKD 5期组和 CKD 4期组,HE4、Cystatin C 和 Scr 的异常率均为100%。在 CKD 3期组,HE4、Cystatin C 和 Scr的异常率分别为95?5%,95?5%和86?4%,3个指标异常率的差异无统计学意义( P >0.05);在 CKD 2期组, HE4的异常率为81.5%,Cystatin C 的异常率为88?9%,Scr 的异常率仅为44.4%,3个指标异常率的差异有统计学意义( P <0.05);CKD1期组,HE4和 Cystatin C 的异常率为36.7%和43?3%,2个指标异常率的差异无统计学意义( P >0.05),而 Scr 的异常率为0。结论血清 HE4浓度与 eGFR 呈负相关,其水平在非卵巢癌肾脏病患者中随着病情加重显著升高,异常检出率与 CystatinC 相当,优于 Scr 。
目的:比較不同分期的慢性腎髒病(CKD)患者血清人附睪分泌蛋白4(HE4)、血清半胱氨痠蛋白酶抑製劑 C(Cystatin C)和血清肌酐(Scr)的符閤率,研究 CKD 患者血清 HE4與估算的腎小毬濾過率(eGFR)的相關性。方法分彆採用電化學髮光法、顆粒增彊免疫透射比濁法、肌氨痠氧化酶法檢測136例 CKD 患者和67名健康對照組的血清 HE4、血清 Cystatin C 和血清 Scr 水平,比較血清 HE4與 eGFR 、血清 Cystatin C 和血清Scr 水平的相關性,分析血清 HE4、血清 Cystatin C 和血清 Scr 水平在 CKD 不同分期患者間的水平差異和不同分期內血清 HE4、血清 Cystatin C 和血清 Scr 的異常率。結果血清 HE4濃度與 eGFR 呈負相關( r =-0?7033, P <0?05);血清 HE4濃度與血清 Cystatin C 濃度呈正相關(r=0?8719,P<0?05),血清 HE4濃度與血清 Scr 濃度呈正相關( r =0?8489,P <0?05)。 CKD 患者血清 HE4、血清 Cystatin C 和血清 Scr 水平隨著 CKD 病情的加重顯著升高,血清 HE4、血清 Cystatin C 和血清 Scr 平均水平在各期間的差異均有統計學意義( P <0?05)。在CKD 5期組和 CKD 4期組,HE4、Cystatin C 和 Scr 的異常率均為100%。在 CKD 3期組,HE4、Cystatin C 和 Scr的異常率分彆為95?5%,95?5%和86?4%,3箇指標異常率的差異無統計學意義( P >0.05);在 CKD 2期組, HE4的異常率為81.5%,Cystatin C 的異常率為88?9%,Scr 的異常率僅為44.4%,3箇指標異常率的差異有統計學意義( P <0.05);CKD1期組,HE4和 Cystatin C 的異常率為36.7%和43?3%,2箇指標異常率的差異無統計學意義( P >0.05),而 Scr 的異常率為0。結論血清 HE4濃度與 eGFR 呈負相關,其水平在非卵巢癌腎髒病患者中隨著病情加重顯著升高,異常檢齣率與 CystatinC 相噹,優于 Scr 。
목적:비교불동분기적만성신장병(CKD)환자혈청인부고분비단백4(HE4)、혈청반광안산단백매억제제 C(Cystatin C)화혈청기항(Scr)적부합솔,연구 CKD 환자혈청 HE4여고산적신소구려과솔(eGFR)적상관성。방법분별채용전화학발광법、과립증강면역투사비탁법、기안산양화매법검측136례 CKD 환자화67명건강대조조적혈청 HE4、혈청 Cystatin C 화혈청 Scr 수평,비교혈청 HE4여 eGFR 、혈청 Cystatin C 화혈청Scr 수평적상관성,분석혈청 HE4、혈청 Cystatin C 화혈청 Scr 수평재 CKD 불동분기환자간적수평차이화불동분기내혈청 HE4、혈청 Cystatin C 화혈청 Scr 적이상솔。결과혈청 HE4농도여 eGFR 정부상관( r =-0?7033, P <0?05);혈청 HE4농도여혈청 Cystatin C 농도정정상관(r=0?8719,P<0?05),혈청 HE4농도여혈청 Scr 농도정정상관( r =0?8489,P <0?05)。 CKD 환자혈청 HE4、혈청 Cystatin C 화혈청 Scr 수평수착 CKD 병정적가중현저승고,혈청 HE4、혈청 Cystatin C 화혈청 Scr 평균수평재각기간적차이균유통계학의의( P <0?05)。재CKD 5기조화 CKD 4기조,HE4、Cystatin C 화 Scr 적이상솔균위100%。재 CKD 3기조,HE4、Cystatin C 화 Scr적이상솔분별위95?5%,95?5%화86?4%,3개지표이상솔적차이무통계학의의( P >0.05);재 CKD 2기조, HE4적이상솔위81.5%,Cystatin C 적이상솔위88?9%,Scr 적이상솔부위44.4%,3개지표이상솔적차이유통계학의의( P <0.05);CKD1기조,HE4화 Cystatin C 적이상솔위36.7%화43?3%,2개지표이상솔적차이무통계학의의( P >0.05),이 Scr 적이상솔위0。결론혈청 HE4농도여 eGFR 정부상관,기수평재비란소암신장병환자중수착병정가중현저승고,이상검출솔여 CystatinC 상당,우우 Scr 。
Objective To compare the coincidence rate of Chronic Kidney Disease(CKD)patients′ human ep‐ididymis secretory protein 4(HE4) ,Cystatin C and serum creatinine(Scr) ,and to make the association study be‐tween CKD patients′ HE4 and eGFR .Methods Tests are conducted with the method of electrochemilumines‐cence ,the method of scattering particles enhancing the immune turbidimetry and the method of sarcosine oxidase to measure values of serum HE4 ,Cystatin C ,and Scr among 136 cases of CKD patients and 67 cases of control . We analyze the association of serum HE4 ,Cystatin C ,and Scr ,and the horizontal differentiation of serum HE4 , Cystatin C ,and Scr in different stages of CKD patients ,and abnormal rate of serum HE4 ,Cystatin C ,and Scr in different stages? Results It demonstrates the negative correlation between HE4 concentration and eGFR( r =- 0?703 3 ,P < 0?05) ;positive correlation between HE4 concentration and serum Cystatin C( r = 0?871 9 ,P <0?05) ,positive correlation between HE4 concentration and Scr (r = 0?848 9 ,P < 0?05) .The values of serum HE4 ,Cystatin C ,and Scr increase significantly with CKD condition′s aggravation .The difference was statistically significant for serum HE4 ,Cystatin C ,and Scr in each stage ( P < 0?05) .The abnormal rate of serum HE4 , Cystatin C ,and Scr is up to 100% in group of CKD stage 5 and CKD stage 4 .The abnormal rates of serum HE4 , Cystatin C ,and Scr in group of CKD stage 3 are 95?5% ,95?5% 和 86?4% ,respectively ,which has no statistical significance among them ( P > 0 .05) .The abnormal rate of HE4 ,Cystatin C and Scr were 81?5% ,88?9% and 44?4% respectively in group of CKD stage 2 ,which had statistical significance among them ( P < 0 .05) .The ab‐normal rates of HE4 and Cystatin C are 36 .7% and 43?3% ,which had no statistical significance among them ( P> 0 .05) ,but the abnormal rate of Scr is 0 .Conclusion It demonstrates the negative correlation between serum HE4 concentration and eGFR .Serum HE4 value increases according to condition′s aggravation among kidney dis‐ease patients with non‐ovarian cancer ,its abnormal detection is the same as Cystatin C and better than Scr .