CAJ | 학술논문

在商品消费领域，售后赔偿纠纷问题越来越普遍，解决这些纠纷问题常常耗时耗力，效率低下。本文针对这一情形，研究了如何使用最终报价仲裁方法来解决这类问题。在最终报价仲裁方法里，仲裁人有一个自己的理想裁决值。我们根据现实情况，讨论了协商双方认为仲裁人的理想裁决值所可能发生的三种情形；然后基于争议双方的期望效用最大化原则，从理论上分析了不同情形下协商双方的最优报价策略。本文提出的结论可对实际的仲裁问题提供有效的参考。
재상품소비영역，수후배상규분문제월래월보편，해결저사규분문제상상모시모력，효솔저하。본문침대저일정형，연구료여하사용최종보개중재방법래해결저류문제。재최종보개중재방법리，중재인유일개자기적이상재결치。아문근거현실정황，토론료협상쌍방인위중재인적이상재결치소가능발생적삼충정형；연후기우쟁의쌍방적기망효용최대화원칙，종이론상분석료불동정형하협상쌍방적최우보개책략。본문제출적결론가대실제적중재문제제공유효적삼고。
Post-sale compensation disputes are increasingly common in commodity consumption .These disputes often cause a lower efficiency and acquire much time and energy .This paper introduces a solution by resorting to final-offer arbitration.The arbitrator determines facts and then selects an offer as the ideal value in its own mind . We discuss three kinds of situations aiming to the ideal value of the arbitrator in which both parties think it should happen .Then we analyze the optimal offer strategies of both parties based on the expected utility maximi-zation principle .The conclusions presented in this paper could provide effective references for the actual arbitra-tion problem .