实用医院临床杂志
實用醫院臨床雜誌
실용의원림상잡지
PRACTICAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
2015年
3期
62-64
,共3页
临床药师%药学干预%抗生素%呼吸内科
臨床藥師%藥學榦預%抗生素%呼吸內科
림상약사%약학간예%항생소%호흡내과
Clinical pharmacists%Pharmaceutical intervention%Antibiotics%Respiratory medicine
目的:探讨临床药师药学干预对呼吸内科合理使用抗生素的影响。方法随机抽取临床药师药学干预前后呼吸内科病例资料各300份,比较干预前后抗生素使用情况、抗感染效果、合理使用等差异。结果干预后抗生素使用率明显低于干预前(71.3%VS 95.7%,P=0.000);单联抗生素使用率明显高于干预前(28.7%VS 19.0%,P =0.028),三联及以上抗生素明显低于干预前(20.0%VS 43.3%,P =0.000);平均住院费用明显少于干预前[(1965.7±265.7) VS (2600.8±316.5)元,P<0.01];抗生素使用不合理性明显低于干预前(20.1%VS 34.2%,P<0.01)。结论临床药师药学干预可促进呼吸内科合理使用抗生素,指导医生用药行为。
目的:探討臨床藥師藥學榦預對呼吸內科閤理使用抗生素的影響。方法隨機抽取臨床藥師藥學榦預前後呼吸內科病例資料各300份,比較榦預前後抗生素使用情況、抗感染效果、閤理使用等差異。結果榦預後抗生素使用率明顯低于榦預前(71.3%VS 95.7%,P=0.000);單聯抗生素使用率明顯高于榦預前(28.7%VS 19.0%,P =0.028),三聯及以上抗生素明顯低于榦預前(20.0%VS 43.3%,P =0.000);平均住院費用明顯少于榦預前[(1965.7±265.7) VS (2600.8±316.5)元,P<0.01];抗生素使用不閤理性明顯低于榦預前(20.1%VS 34.2%,P<0.01)。結論臨床藥師藥學榦預可促進呼吸內科閤理使用抗生素,指導醫生用藥行為。
목적:탐토림상약사약학간예대호흡내과합리사용항생소적영향。방법수궤추취림상약사약학간예전후호흡내과병례자료각300빈,비교간예전후항생소사용정황、항감염효과、합리사용등차이。결과간예후항생소사용솔명현저우간예전(71.3%VS 95.7%,P=0.000);단련항생소사용솔명현고우간예전(28.7%VS 19.0%,P =0.028),삼련급이상항생소명현저우간예전(20.0%VS 43.3%,P =0.000);평균주원비용명현소우간예전[(1965.7±265.7) VS (2600.8±316.5)원,P<0.01];항생소사용불합이성명현저우간예전(20.1%VS 34.2%,P<0.01)。결론림상약사약학간예가촉진호흡내과합리사용항생소,지도의생용약행위。
Objective To investigate the effect of clinical pharmacists ’pharmaceutical intervention on reasonable use of antibi-otics in department of respiratory medicine .Methods The clinical data of 300 cases before and after clinical pharmacists ’pharmaceuti-cal intervention were randomly collected .The differences in application of antibiotics ,anti-infection effect and reasonable use before and after intervention were compared.Results After the intervention,antibiotics usage were significantly lower (71.3% vs 95.7%,P =0.000),single union antibiotics usage was significantly higher (28.7%vs 19.0%,P =0.028) and sanlian and above antibiotics were significantly lower(20.0%vs 43.3%,P =0.0001) when compared to before the intervention .The hospitalization cost was also signifi-cantly less than before intervention(1965.7 ±265.7)yuan vs (2600.8 ±316.5 yuan)].The irrational antibiotic use was significantly lower than before intervention(20.1% vs 34.2%).Conclusion Clinical pharmacists’pharmaceutical intervention can promote rea-sonable use of antibiotics ,and regulate behavior of doctor ’s medication .