中国健康心理学杂志
中國健康心理學雜誌
중국건강심이학잡지
HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY JOURNAL
2015年
6期
849-852
,共4页
甘景梨%梁学军%高存友%段惠峰%祝希泉
甘景梨%樑學軍%高存友%段惠峰%祝希泉
감경리%량학군%고존우%단혜봉%축희천
军人%岗位匹配%认知能力%个性特征%心理特征
軍人%崗位匹配%認知能力%箇性特徵%心理特徵
군인%강위필배%인지능력%개성특정%심리특정
Servicemen%Job -matched%Cognition%Personality characteristics%Psychological charac-teristics
目的:探讨不同军兵种优秀官兵的认知能力、个性特征与心理状况,了解其各自的特点。方法:采用李德明编制《基本认知能力测验》2.0版、艾森克个性问卷(EPQ)和症状自评量表(SCL-90),选取陆(装甲兵)、海(潜艇兵)、空(飞行员)3兵种具有代表性的优秀岗位人员进行调查,并将结果进行比较。结果:3组官兵认知能力特征方面得分存在显著性差异(F=3.24~4.58,P<0.05)。3组官兵EPQ调查显示,E分方面飞行员、装甲兵和潜艇兵依次降低(F=8.54,P<0.05),N、P分方面装甲兵、潜艇兵和飞行员依次增高(F=4.67,5.35;P<0.05或0.01);SCL-90总分及各因子分之间存在明显差异,潜艇兵SCL-90总分、躯体化及人际关系敏感高于其他两个兵种,强迫和恐怖两因子得分飞行员明显高于其它两兵种,而焦虑、抑郁因子装甲兵得分最高(F=3.26~4.87,P<0.05)。结论:不同兵种优秀官兵之间认知能力、EPQ和SCL-90存在显著性差异,不同岗位有其各自特点,总体来说,飞行员要优于其它两兵种,可能同飞行员的心理选拔起步早,检测和心理训练系统更加完善有关。
目的:探討不同軍兵種優秀官兵的認知能力、箇性特徵與心理狀況,瞭解其各自的特點。方法:採用李德明編製《基本認知能力測驗》2.0版、艾森剋箇性問捲(EPQ)和癥狀自評量錶(SCL-90),選取陸(裝甲兵)、海(潛艇兵)、空(飛行員)3兵種具有代錶性的優秀崗位人員進行調查,併將結果進行比較。結果:3組官兵認知能力特徵方麵得分存在顯著性差異(F=3.24~4.58,P<0.05)。3組官兵EPQ調查顯示,E分方麵飛行員、裝甲兵和潛艇兵依次降低(F=8.54,P<0.05),N、P分方麵裝甲兵、潛艇兵和飛行員依次增高(F=4.67,5.35;P<0.05或0.01);SCL-90總分及各因子分之間存在明顯差異,潛艇兵SCL-90總分、軀體化及人際關繫敏感高于其他兩箇兵種,彊迫和恐怖兩因子得分飛行員明顯高于其它兩兵種,而焦慮、抑鬱因子裝甲兵得分最高(F=3.26~4.87,P<0.05)。結論:不同兵種優秀官兵之間認知能力、EPQ和SCL-90存在顯著性差異,不同崗位有其各自特點,總體來說,飛行員要優于其它兩兵種,可能同飛行員的心理選拔起步早,檢測和心理訓練繫統更加完善有關。
목적:탐토불동군병충우수관병적인지능력、개성특정여심리상황,료해기각자적특점。방법:채용리덕명편제《기본인지능력측험》2.0판、애삼극개성문권(EPQ)화증상자평량표(SCL-90),선취륙(장갑병)、해(잠정병)、공(비행원)3병충구유대표성적우수강위인원진행조사,병장결과진행비교。결과:3조관병인지능력특정방면득분존재현저성차이(F=3.24~4.58,P<0.05)。3조관병EPQ조사현시,E분방면비행원、장갑병화잠정병의차강저(F=8.54,P<0.05),N、P분방면장갑병、잠정병화비행원의차증고(F=4.67,5.35;P<0.05혹0.01);SCL-90총분급각인자분지간존재명현차이,잠정병SCL-90총분、구체화급인제관계민감고우기타량개병충,강박화공포량인자득분비행원명현고우기타량병충,이초필、억욱인자장갑병득분최고(F=3.26~4.87,P<0.05)。결론:불동병충우수관병지간인지능력、EPQ화SCL-90존재현저성차이,불동강위유기각자특점,총체래설,비행원요우우기타량병충,가능동비행원적심리선발기보조,검측화심리훈련계통경가완선유관。
Objective:To investigate cognitive abilities ,personality traits and mental condition of dif-ferent branches of superior military officers ,and understand their own characteristics .Methods:Three u-nits outstanding representative staff positions in army ( armored ) , navy ( submarine soldiers ) , air force (pilot),were investigated by deming preparation of basic cognitive ability test version 2.0,Eysenck Per-sonality Questionnaire ( EPQ ) and Symptom Checklist 90 ( SCL -90 ) .Results:Cognitive characteristic scores of three groups of servicemen showed significant differences (F=3.24~4.58,P<0.05).EPQ of three groups of soldiers showed that factor E decreased with pilots ,soldiers-armor and submarines ( F=8.54,P<0.05).Factor N and factor P that sub -areas armored submarine soldiers and pilots were in-creased(F=4.67,5.35;P<0.05 or 0.01).SCL-90 total score and factor scores were significantly dif-ferent.The SCL-90 score,somatization and interpersonal sensitivity submarine soldiers were higher than the other two arms .The scores of coercion and terror that the military pilot was the highest ,while anxiety , depression factor that armored army was the highest (F=3.26~4.87,P<0.05).Conclusion:There is a significant difference of excellent soldiers with different arms in different positions in cognitive ,EPQ and SCL-90 which have their own characteristics .In general,the military pilots is superior to the other two branches of soldiers ,perhaps the reason is that the pilot's psychological selection starts earlier and psycho-logical training system is more comprehensive .