国际眼科杂志
國際眼科雜誌
국제안과잡지
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY
2015年
5期
869-871
,共3页
青少年%单眼近视%轻度近视%主导眼%近视程度
青少年%單眼近視%輕度近視%主導眼%近視程度
청소년%단안근시%경도근시%주도안%근시정도
teenagers%monocular myopia%mild myopia%dominant eye%myopia degree
目的：研究青少年单眼轻度近视主导眼与近视程度间的关系。<br> 方法：回顾分析我院2012-12/2013-12于我科门诊检查的158例青少年单眼轻度近视患者资料,以柱镜散光值作等效球镜转换,依据近视程度将其分为三组, A 组30例(-0.25~-0.75D),B组92例(-1.0~-2.0D),C组36例(-2.25~-3.0D)。选择卡洞法对受检者注视近33cm处、远5m处主导眼进行测量,对屈光不正予以配镜矫正后,再对远、近处主导眼别进行重新测量。<br> 结果：单眼轻度近视主导眼、非主导眼的调节功能相较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。三组主导眼、非主导眼平均屈光度与眼别的相关性相较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。三组5 m处主导眼眼别相较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。三组33cm处主导眼眼别相较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。不同视物距离下主导眼眼别相较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。单眼轻度近视裸眼与配镜后主导眼眼别相较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。<br> 结论：近视性屈光参差的形成,与视物的清晰程度有关,予以配镜矫治虽然可改善视物的清晰程度,同时也会影响主导眼的选择,由于近视性屈光参差最早出现于主导眼,因此配镜矫治阶段需将其考虑在内,避免青少年近视程度加重。
目的：研究青少年單眼輕度近視主導眼與近視程度間的關繫。<br> 方法：迴顧分析我院2012-12/2013-12于我科門診檢查的158例青少年單眼輕度近視患者資料,以柱鏡散光值作等效毬鏡轉換,依據近視程度將其分為三組, A 組30例(-0.25~-0.75D),B組92例(-1.0~-2.0D),C組36例(-2.25~-3.0D)。選擇卡洞法對受檢者註視近33cm處、遠5m處主導眼進行測量,對屈光不正予以配鏡矯正後,再對遠、近處主導眼彆進行重新測量。<br> 結果：單眼輕度近視主導眼、非主導眼的調節功能相較,差異無統計學意義(P>0.05)。三組主導眼、非主導眼平均屈光度與眼彆的相關性相較,差異無統計學意義(P>0.05)。三組5 m處主導眼眼彆相較,差異有統計學意義(P<0.05)。三組33cm處主導眼眼彆相較,差異有統計學意義(P<0.05)。不同視物距離下主導眼眼彆相較,差異有統計學意義(P<0.05)。單眼輕度近視裸眼與配鏡後主導眼眼彆相較,差異有統計學意義(P<0.05)。<br> 結論：近視性屈光參差的形成,與視物的清晰程度有關,予以配鏡矯治雖然可改善視物的清晰程度,同時也會影響主導眼的選擇,由于近視性屈光參差最早齣現于主導眼,因此配鏡矯治階段需將其攷慮在內,避免青少年近視程度加重。
목적：연구청소년단안경도근시주도안여근시정도간적관계。<br> 방법：회고분석아원2012-12/2013-12우아과문진검사적158례청소년단안경도근시환자자료,이주경산광치작등효구경전환,의거근시정도장기분위삼조, A 조30례(-0.25~-0.75D),B조92례(-1.0~-2.0D),C조36례(-2.25~-3.0D)。선택잡동법대수검자주시근33cm처、원5m처주도안진행측량,대굴광불정여이배경교정후,재대원、근처주도안별진행중신측량。<br> 결과：단안경도근시주도안、비주도안적조절공능상교,차이무통계학의의(P>0.05)。삼조주도안、비주도안평균굴광도여안별적상관성상교,차이무통계학의의(P>0.05)。삼조5 m처주도안안별상교,차이유통계학의의(P<0.05)。삼조33cm처주도안안별상교,차이유통계학의의(P<0.05)。불동시물거리하주도안안별상교,차이유통계학의의(P<0.05)。단안경도근시라안여배경후주도안안별상교,차이유통계학의의(P<0.05)。<br> 결론：근시성굴광삼차적형성,여시물적청석정도유관,여이배경교치수연가개선시물적청석정도,동시야회영향주도안적선택,유우근시성굴광삼차최조출현우주도안,인차배경교치계단수장기고필재내,피면청소년근시정도가중。
?AlM: To study the correlation between monocular mild myopic juvenile myopia degree and dominant eye. <br> ? METHODS: Totally 158 patients with juvenile monocularly mild myopia in our hospital from December 2012 to December 2013 were retrospectively analyzed, and cylindrical mirror astigmatism was used for spherical equivalent conversion. On the basis of the myopic degree, they were divided into three groups, 30 cases in group A (-0. 25~-0. 75D), 92 cases in B group (-1. 0~-2. 0D), 36 cases in group C (-2. 25 ~ -3. 0D). The card hole method was selected to measure dominant eye for subjectsat nearly 33cm and 5m. After glasses correction of ametropia, the far and near dominant eyes were received measurement again. <br> ?RESULTS:The monocular mild myopia of dominant eye was compared with the non-dominant eye adjustment function, and there was no significant difference ( P>0. 05 ) . The dominant eye, non - dominant eye mean diopter and other correlations of eyes in the three groups were compared, and there was no significant difference (P>0. 05). The dominant eye of three groups at 5m was compared, and there was significant difference (P<0. 05). The dominant eye of three groups at 33cm was compared, and there was significant difference (P<0. 05). Dominant eye at different visual distance was compared, and there was significant difference (P<0. 05). Monocular uncorrected eye was compared with dominant eye mild afte myopia glassesr, and there was significant difference (P< 0. 05). <br> ?CONCLUSlON: The formation of myopic anisometropia is related to the degree of clearly seeing objects, although glasses correction can improve the clarity and visual, but affect the choice of the dominant eye, because the myopic anisometropia appears most early in the dominant eye, therefore optician correction stage, which should be taken into consideration, and avoid the severity of the adolescent myopia.
