陕西中医
陝西中醫
협서중의
SHAANXI JOURNAL OF TRADITIONAL CHINESE MEDICINE
2015年
5期
538-540
,共3页
腹泻/中医药疗法%胃苓汤/治疗应用
腹瀉/中醫藥療法%胃苓湯/治療應用
복사/중의약요법%위령탕/치료응용
Diarrhea/traditional Chinese medicine therapy%Wei Ling Tang/therapeutic uses%Wei Ling De-coction
目的:比较不同中成药辅助治疗急性腹泻的临床疗效,为临床提供最佳的治疗方案。方法:选择2010年3月~2013年5月来我院诊治的80例急性腹泻患者,按随机数字表法分为治疗组、对照组,每组患者40例。治疗组患者给予胃苓汤治疗;对照组患者服用黄连素片治疗腹泻。观察比较两组患者治疗前后典型的临床症状的变化;分析两组患者的临床治疗效果。结果:治疗前,治疗组患者与对照组患者的临床特征无显著差异( P>0.05);治疗后,治疗组患者的肠鸣音、大便性状异常、腹痛、腹胀、里急后重、发热与呕吐等临床症状的例数及比例均较对照组患者的例数和比例显著降低,具有统计学意义(P<0.05);经过治疗,治疗组患者的总有效率为95.0%,较对照组患者的总有效率(67.5%)明显高,具有显著性差异( P<0.05)。结论:服用胃苓汤治疗急性腹泻患者,能够显著缓解肠鸣音、大便性状异常、腹痛、腹胀、里急后重、发热与呕吐等临床症状,明显提高临床治疗效果,均较使用黄连素片治疗较佳,是一种较为理想的治疗方法。
目的:比較不同中成藥輔助治療急性腹瀉的臨床療效,為臨床提供最佳的治療方案。方法:選擇2010年3月~2013年5月來我院診治的80例急性腹瀉患者,按隨機數字錶法分為治療組、對照組,每組患者40例。治療組患者給予胃苓湯治療;對照組患者服用黃連素片治療腹瀉。觀察比較兩組患者治療前後典型的臨床癥狀的變化;分析兩組患者的臨床治療效果。結果:治療前,治療組患者與對照組患者的臨床特徵無顯著差異( P>0.05);治療後,治療組患者的腸鳴音、大便性狀異常、腹痛、腹脹、裏急後重、髮熱與嘔吐等臨床癥狀的例數及比例均較對照組患者的例數和比例顯著降低,具有統計學意義(P<0.05);經過治療,治療組患者的總有效率為95.0%,較對照組患者的總有效率(67.5%)明顯高,具有顯著性差異( P<0.05)。結論:服用胃苓湯治療急性腹瀉患者,能夠顯著緩解腸鳴音、大便性狀異常、腹痛、腹脹、裏急後重、髮熱與嘔吐等臨床癥狀,明顯提高臨床治療效果,均較使用黃連素片治療較佳,是一種較為理想的治療方法。
목적:비교불동중성약보조치료급성복사적림상료효,위림상제공최가적치료방안。방법:선택2010년3월~2013년5월래아원진치적80례급성복사환자,안수궤수자표법분위치료조、대조조,매조환자40례。치료조환자급여위령탕치료;대조조환자복용황련소편치료복사。관찰비교량조환자치료전후전형적림상증상적변화;분석량조환자적림상치료효과。결과:치료전,치료조환자여대조조환자적림상특정무현저차이( P>0.05);치료후,치료조환자적장명음、대편성상이상、복통、복창、리급후중、발열여구토등림상증상적례수급비례균교대조조환자적례수화비례현저강저,구유통계학의의(P<0.05);경과치료,치료조환자적총유효솔위95.0%,교대조조환자적총유효솔(67.5%)명현고,구유현저성차이( P<0.05)。결론:복용위령탕치료급성복사환자,능구현저완해장명음、대편성상이상、복통、복창、리급후중、발열여구토등림상증상,명현제고림상치료효과,균교사용황련소편치료교가,시일충교위이상적치료방법。
Objective:To compare the clinical efficacy of different proprietary secondary treatment of acute di‐arrhea ,to provide the best clinical treatment options .Methods :80 cases of acute diarrhea patients in March 2010 to May 2013 for treatment in our hospital were randomly divided into experimental group and control group ,40 patients in each group .The experimental group were given Weiling decoction ;control group of patients taking berberine to treat diarrhea . Comparing two groups of patients before and after changes in the typical clinical symptoms;analysis of clinical outcomes of two groups of patients .Results :Before treatment ,the patients in the experimental group had no significant difference (P> 0 .05) and clinical characteristics of the patients in the control group;after treatment ,the patient's bowel sounds in the experimental group ,stool abnormalities ,clinical abdominal pain ,bloating ,tenesmus ,fever and vomiting ,etc .the number and proportion of the number of cases of symptomatic patients than in the control group and significantly reduced the proportion of patients ,statistically significant (P <0 .05);after treatment ,patients in the experimental group ,the total effective rate was 95 .0% ,compared with the control group of patients with total efficiency (67 .5% ) was signifi‐cantly higher ,with a significant difference (P <0 .05) .Conclusion :Patients taking Weiling decoction acute diarrhea ,can significantly relieve bowel sounds ,stool abnormalities ,abdominal pain ,bloating ,tenesmus clinical symptoms such as fe‐ver and vomiting ,significantly improved clinical outcomes ,compared with the use of berberine better treatment ,is an i‐deal method of treatment .