CAJ | 학술논문

目的：探讨血管超声与脑血管造影对颈动脉狭窄患者的诊断价值。方法回顾性分析我院收治的缺血性脑血管病96例患者的临床资料，分析并比较两种不同检测方法对96例患者的诊断结果及检测准确率。结果以造影结果作为标准，血管造影检测患者的总动脉狭窄及重度颈内动脉狭窄的敏感性显著高于血管超声检测（P＜0.05），二者特异性与准确性比较差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。结论对于颈动脉狭窄患者来说，应用血管超声检测出来的结果更加准确有效。将血管超声检测与血管造影技术联合应用，能够取得更为理想的检测效果。
목적：탐토혈관초성여뇌혈관조영대경동맥협착환자적진단개치。방법회고성분석아원수치적결혈성뇌혈관병96례환자적림상자료，분석병비교량충불동검측방법대96례환자적진단결과급검측준학솔。결과이조영결과작위표준，혈관조영검측환자적총동맥협착급중도경내동맥협착적민감성현저고우혈관초성검측（P＜0.05），이자특이성여준학성비교차이무통계학의의（P＞0.05）。결론대우경동맥협착환자래설，응용혈관초성검측출래적결과경가준학유효。장혈관초성검측여혈관조영기술연합응용，능구취득경위이상적검측효과。
ObjectiveTo investigate the vascular ultrasound,and the diagnostic value of cerebral angiography in patients with carotid artery stenosis.MethodsFrom our hospital were retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 96 cases the diagnosis results of 96 patients and testing accuracy.ResultsTo angiography as a standard, the angiographic detecting total artery stenosis and severe internal carotid artery stenosis in patients with signiifcantly higher sensitivity of vascular ultrasound(P<0.05), speciifcity and accuracy of both comparative difference was not signiifcant (P>0.05).ConclusionFor patients with carotid artery stenosis, vascular ultrasound detected results more accurate and effective. To vascular angiography technology combined ultrasonic testing and application, to obtain a more ideal testing effect.