中国现代医生
中國現代醫生
중국현대의생
CHINA MODERN DOCTOR
2015年
10期
93-95,99
,共4页
神经介入治疗%脑血管疾病%并发症
神經介入治療%腦血管疾病%併髮癥
신경개입치료%뇌혈관질병%병발증
Neural interventional treatment%Cerebral vascular disease%Complications
目的：探讨脑血管病运用神经介入治疗的临床效果。方法于2010年5月~2014年5月期间，选取在我科住院治疗的50例脑血管病患者，据其意愿分为研究组与对照组，在术后行满意度调查，调查内容包括：患者症状（肢体活动、语言、意识、头痛）、查体情况（肌张力分级）及相关并发症（消化道出血、肺部感染及心脏情况等）缓解情况的满意程度。结果DSA结果示：研究组病患颈动脉及椎动脉狭窄情况（降低75豫以上）优于对照组（降低45豫左右）。对照组复发1例，研究组脑血管复发率较低；术后满意度结果示：研究组（92.68%）跃对照组（44.44%），脑血管病患者更为满意神经介入治疗（P<0.05）。结论神经介入治疗不仅疗效显著，且对病患恢复及生活质量的提高有积极意义，应在临床上推广使用。
目的：探討腦血管病運用神經介入治療的臨床效果。方法于2010年5月~2014年5月期間，選取在我科住院治療的50例腦血管病患者，據其意願分為研究組與對照組，在術後行滿意度調查，調查內容包括：患者癥狀（肢體活動、語言、意識、頭痛）、查體情況（肌張力分級）及相關併髮癥（消化道齣血、肺部感染及心髒情況等）緩解情況的滿意程度。結果DSA結果示：研究組病患頸動脈及椎動脈狹窄情況（降低75豫以上）優于對照組（降低45豫左右）。對照組複髮1例，研究組腦血管複髮率較低；術後滿意度結果示：研究組（92.68%）躍對照組（44.44%），腦血管病患者更為滿意神經介入治療（P<0.05）。結論神經介入治療不僅療效顯著，且對病患恢複及生活質量的提高有積極意義，應在臨床上推廣使用。
목적：탐토뇌혈관병운용신경개입치료적림상효과。방법우2010년5월~2014년5월기간，선취재아과주원치료적50례뇌혈관병환자，거기의원분위연구조여대조조，재술후행만의도조사，조사내용포괄：환자증상（지체활동、어언、의식、두통）、사체정황（기장력분급）급상관병발증（소화도출혈、폐부감염급심장정황등）완해정황적만의정도。결과DSA결과시：연구조병환경동맥급추동맥협착정황（강저75예이상）우우대조조（강저45예좌우）。대조조복발1례，연구조뇌혈관복발솔교저；술후만의도결과시：연구조（92.68%）약대조조（44.44%），뇌혈관병환자경위만의신경개입치료（P<0.05）。결론신경개입치료불부료효현저，차대병환회복급생활질량적제고유적겁의의，응재림상상추엄사용。
Objective To investigate and analyze the clinical effect of neural interventional treatment in cerebrovascu-lar diseases. Methods 50 patients with cerebrovascular disease who hospitalized in our department from May 2010 to May 2014 were selected. According to their willingness, they were divided into the observation group and the control group. They were given the satisfaction investigation after operation, which included patients' symptoms (physical activity, language, consciousness and headache), body condition (muscle tension classification) and satisfaction of related compli-cations (hemorrhage of digestive tract, infection of lung and heart conditions etc.) remission. Results DSA showed that carotid and vertebral artery stenosis of the observation group (with more than 75% reduction) were superior to those of the control group (with about 45%reduction). 1 case in the control group recurred, and the observation group had lower cerebral vascular recurrence rate. Postoperative satisfaction results showed that satisfaction of the observation group (92.68%) was higher than that of the control group (44.44%) and the neural interventional treatment was more satisfying for patients with cerebrovascular disease (P<0.05). Conclusion Neural interventional therapy is not only remarkably curative, but also helpful for the recovery and life quality improvement of patients. It should be promoted in clinic.
