中国现代医生
中國現代醫生
중국현대의생
CHINA MODERN DOCTOR
2015年
11期
146-149
,共4页
非小细胞肺癌%癌因性疲乏%生活质量%优质护理
非小細胞肺癌%癌因性疲乏%生活質量%優質護理
비소세포폐암%암인성피핍%생활질량%우질호리
Non-small cell lung cancer%Cancer related fatigue%Quality of life%Quality care
目的：探讨优质护理改善非小细胞肺癌患者癌因性疲乏及其生活质量的作用。方法将纳入的110例非小细胞肺癌患者随机分为干预组和对照组各55例，两组均给予肺癌化疗常规护理，干预组在此基础上给予优质护理干预，采用Piper疲乏自评修正量表(RPFS)、安德森症状评估量表(MDASI)、癌症患者生活质量评估量表(EORTC QLQ-C30)评价两组干预前后状态。结果干预后干预组躯体、行为、情感、认知及RPFS总分与干预前比较，差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)，且与对照组比较，差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)，干预后干预组MDASI量表疲劳、睡眠、恶心、苦恼、悲伤、麻木感、一般活动、人际关系、生活乐趣评分与对照组比较，差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。干预后干预组EORTC QLQ-C30量表躯体功能、角色功能、情绪功能、认知功能、社会功能、总体健康状况评分与对照组比较，差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论优质护理可有效缓解非小细胞肺癌患者癌因性疲乏，改善癌症相关症状，提高生活质量。
目的：探討優質護理改善非小細胞肺癌患者癌因性疲乏及其生活質量的作用。方法將納入的110例非小細胞肺癌患者隨機分為榦預組和對照組各55例，兩組均給予肺癌化療常規護理，榦預組在此基礎上給予優質護理榦預，採用Piper疲乏自評脩正量錶(RPFS)、安德森癥狀評估量錶(MDASI)、癌癥患者生活質量評估量錶(EORTC QLQ-C30)評價兩組榦預前後狀態。結果榦預後榦預組軀體、行為、情感、認知及RPFS總分與榦預前比較，差異均有統計學意義(P<0.05)，且與對照組比較，差異均有統計學意義(P<0.05)，榦預後榦預組MDASI量錶疲勞、睡眠、噁心、苦惱、悲傷、痳木感、一般活動、人際關繫、生活樂趣評分與對照組比較，差異均有統計學意義(P<0.05)。榦預後榦預組EORTC QLQ-C30量錶軀體功能、角色功能、情緒功能、認知功能、社會功能、總體健康狀況評分與對照組比較，差異均有統計學意義(P<0.05)。結論優質護理可有效緩解非小細胞肺癌患者癌因性疲乏，改善癌癥相關癥狀，提高生活質量。
목적：탐토우질호리개선비소세포폐암환자암인성피핍급기생활질량적작용。방법장납입적110례비소세포폐암환자수궤분위간예조화대조조각55례，량조균급여폐암화료상규호리，간예조재차기출상급여우질호리간예，채용Piper피핍자평수정량표(RPFS)、안덕삼증상평고량표(MDASI)、암증환자생활질량평고량표(EORTC QLQ-C30)평개량조간예전후상태。결과간예후간예조구체、행위、정감、인지급RPFS총분여간예전비교，차이균유통계학의의(P<0.05)，차여대조조비교，차이균유통계학의의(P<0.05)，간예후간예조MDASI량표피로、수면、악심、고뇌、비상、마목감、일반활동、인제관계、생활악취평분여대조조비교，차이균유통계학의의(P<0.05)。간예후간예조EORTC QLQ-C30량표구체공능、각색공능、정서공능、인지공능、사회공능、총체건강상황평분여대조조비교，차이균유통계학의의(P<0.05)。결론우질호리가유효완해비소세포폐암환자암인성피핍，개선암증상관증상，제고생활질량。
Objective To investigate the role of quality care to improve the non-small cell lung cancer related fatigue in patients with cancer and quality of life. Methods A total of 110 cases of non-small cell lung cancer patients were randomly divided into intervention group and control group,each of 55 cases, two groups were given conventional can-cer chemotherapy treatments, the intervention group received quality care interventions on this basis, used self-assess-ment amendment Piper fatigue scale (RPFS), Anderson symptom assessment scale (MDASI), the quality of life of cancer patients before and after assessment scale(EORTC QLQ-C30) evaluated two interventions state. Results The differences of emotional, cognitive and RPFS scores and intervention were statistically significant between before and after inter-vention in the intervention group(P<0.05), and compared with the control group, the differences were statistically sig nificant (P<0.05), the differences of MDASI scale fatigue, sleep, nausea, anguish, sadness, numbness, general activities, relationships, enjoyment of life scores between the intervention group and control group after the intervention, were sta-tistically significant (P<0.05). The differences of EORTC QLQ-C30 scale physical function, role function, emotional function, cognitive function, social function, overall health score between intervention group and control group after in-tervention were statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion Quality care could relieve patients with non-small cell lung cancer-related fatigue and improve cancer-related symptoms and quality of life.
