泸州医学院学报
瀘州醫學院學報
로주의학원학보
JOURNAL OF LUZHOU MEDICAL COLLEGE
2015年
1期
82-84
,共3页
刘青焱%阳艾玲%汪贵宇%刘兴铃%葛方群%张琳%刘珉甬
劉青焱%暘艾玲%汪貴宇%劉興鈴%葛方群%張琳%劉珉甬
류청염%양애령%왕귀우%류흥령%갈방군%장림%류민용
导管头皮针%钢针头皮针%刺破血管%液体渗漏%活动受限
導管頭皮針%鋼針頭皮針%刺破血管%液體滲漏%活動受限
도관두피침%강침두피침%자파혈관%액체삼루%활동수한
Catheter needles%Steel needle%Pierce the vascular%Liquid leakage%Limitation of activity
目的::通过一次性使用导管头皮针与钢针头皮针临床效果对比研究,找出其差异性,为导管头皮针推广应用提出客观依据。方法:将临床80例患者随机分为实验组和对照组,实验组采用一次性使用导管头皮针输液,对照组采用一次性使用钢针头皮针输液。观察两组输液过程中刺破血管率、液体渗漏率、活动受限情况。结果:输液过程中刺破血管率实验组为0,对照组为22.5%;液体渗漏率实验组为0,对照组为22.5%;活动受限率实验组为0,对照组为100%,两组比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:一次性使用导管头皮针在输液过程中能降低刺破血管率和液体渗漏率,活动不受限,临床效果优于钢针头皮针,值得推广。
目的::通過一次性使用導管頭皮針與鋼針頭皮針臨床效果對比研究,找齣其差異性,為導管頭皮針推廣應用提齣客觀依據。方法:將臨床80例患者隨機分為實驗組和對照組,實驗組採用一次性使用導管頭皮針輸液,對照組採用一次性使用鋼針頭皮針輸液。觀察兩組輸液過程中刺破血管率、液體滲漏率、活動受限情況。結果:輸液過程中刺破血管率實驗組為0,對照組為22.5%;液體滲漏率實驗組為0,對照組為22.5%;活動受限率實驗組為0,對照組為100%,兩組比較差異均有統計學意義(P<0.05)。結論:一次性使用導管頭皮針在輸液過程中能降低刺破血管率和液體滲漏率,活動不受限,臨床效果優于鋼針頭皮針,值得推廣。
목적::통과일차성사용도관두피침여강침두피침림상효과대비연구,조출기차이성,위도관두피침추엄응용제출객관의거。방법:장림상80례환자수궤분위실험조화대조조,실험조채용일차성사용도관두피침수액,대조조채용일차성사용강침두피침수액。관찰량조수액과정중자파혈관솔、액체삼루솔、활동수한정황。결과:수액과정중자파혈관솔실험조위0,대조조위22.5%;액체삼루솔실험조위0,대조조위22.5%;활동수한솔실험조위0,대조조위100%,량조비교차이균유통계학의의(P<0.05)。결론:일차성사용도관두피침재수액과정중능강저자파혈관솔화액체삼루솔,활동불수한,림상효과우우강침두피침,치득추엄。
Objective: To find out the differences between needle and catheter needle and steel needle by comparing their clinical effects and provide a scientific basis for the popularization and application of indwelling catheter needle. Methods: 80 patients were randomly divided into two groups. The experimental group was transfused by using catheter needle and the control group steel needle. The rate of piercing vascular, rate of liquid leakage and the activity limitation of the patients were tested in the two groups. Results: The rates of piercing vascular and liquid leakage were both 0 in the experimental group and 22.5%in the control group; the rate of activities limitation during the transfusion was 0 in the experimental group and 100% in the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion: The rate of piercing vascular and liquid leakage could be reduced, and the activity of the patients would not be limited by using catheter needle instead of the steed needle. The catheter needle is worthy of popularization and application.