安徽医科大学学报
安徽醫科大學學報
안휘의과대학학보
ACTA UNIVERSITY MEDICINALIS ANHUI
2015年
4期
529-532
,共4页
TF%Protaper%根管偏移%弯曲根管%锥形束CT
TF%Protaper%根管偏移%彎麯根管%錐形束CT
TF%Protaper%근관편이%만곡근관%추형속CT
TF%protaper%root canal deviation%curved root canal%cone beam computer tomography
目的:以锥束CT( CBCT)为研究工具评价TF和Pro-taper在预备离体牙弯曲根管中所产生的根管偏移。方法将按纳入标准收集的40个离体牙随机分为两组,用冠向下( crown-down)法预备,TF组预备至0.06/#25;Protaper组预备至F2。预备前后均用CBCT对离体牙近中、远中根管壁的厚度进行测量,然后利用Gambill 提出的公式进行根管偏移和轴中心率的计算。结果 TF组较Protaper组所需预备时间短,效率较高( P<0.05);TF组和Protaper组器械在预备平均5个根管后都出现变形,无器械折断;在距根尖3、5、7 mm的内外侧壁所测得的根管偏移量比较中,TF组预备产生的根管偏移量小于Protaper组,而其轴中心率大于Protaper组,更接近于1。结论 TF在预备弯曲根管时能较好地维持根管原始形态,具有更高的效率;CBCT可在无创情况下评价预备器械对根管的成形能力。
目的:以錐束CT( CBCT)為研究工具評價TF和Pro-taper在預備離體牙彎麯根管中所產生的根管偏移。方法將按納入標準收集的40箇離體牙隨機分為兩組,用冠嚮下( crown-down)法預備,TF組預備至0.06/#25;Protaper組預備至F2。預備前後均用CBCT對離體牙近中、遠中根管壁的厚度進行測量,然後利用Gambill 提齣的公式進行根管偏移和軸中心率的計算。結果 TF組較Protaper組所需預備時間短,效率較高( P<0.05);TF組和Protaper組器械在預備平均5箇根管後都齣現變形,無器械摺斷;在距根尖3、5、7 mm的內外側壁所測得的根管偏移量比較中,TF組預備產生的根管偏移量小于Protaper組,而其軸中心率大于Protaper組,更接近于1。結論 TF在預備彎麯根管時能較好地維持根管原始形態,具有更高的效率;CBCT可在無創情況下評價預備器械對根管的成形能力。
목적:이추속CT( CBCT)위연구공구평개TF화Pro-taper재예비리체아만곡근관중소산생적근관편이。방법장안납입표준수집적40개리체아수궤분위량조,용관향하( crown-down)법예비,TF조예비지0.06/#25;Protaper조예비지F2。예비전후균용CBCT대리체아근중、원중근관벽적후도진행측량,연후이용Gambill 제출적공식진행근관편이화축중심솔적계산。결과 TF조교Protaper조소수예비시간단,효솔교고( P<0.05);TF조화Protaper조기계재예비평균5개근관후도출현변형,무기계절단;재거근첨3、5、7 mm적내외측벽소측득적근관편이량비교중,TF조예비산생적근관편이량소우Protaper조,이기축중심솔대우Protaper조,경접근우1。결론 TF재예비만곡근관시능교호지유지근관원시형태,구유경고적효솔;CBCT가재무창정황하평개예비기계대근관적성형능력。
Objective To evaluate the root canal deviations in vitro teeth curved root with TF and Protaper instru-ments by cone beam computer tomography( CBCT) . Methods 40 teeth in vitro in the standard collection were ran-domly assigned to two groups, prepared with the crown-down method, the TF group ready to 0. 06/#25; the Pro-taper group ready to F2 . CBCT scans were taken to measure the mesial and distal thicknesses of the tube wall in vitro teeth before and after preparation. The root canal deviation and the rate of shaft center were measured with ref-erence to the formula proposed by Gambill. Results The TF group need less time in preparation and has more effi-ciency(P<0. 05) than the Protaper group; both TF and Protaper devices appeared deformation after 5 root canal preparations in average, no instruments broken. Comparing the offset of the internal and external wall of root canal in 3, 5, 7 mm from the apex, the root canal deviation prepared by the TF group was less than the Protaper group, and its rate of axis center was greater than the Protaper group, closer to 1. Conclusion TF can maintain original root canal morphology in preparing curved root canal, also has higher efficiency;under the noninvasive condition, the root canal forming ability of preparation instruments can be evaluated by CBCT.