安徽医科大学学报
安徽醫科大學學報
안휘의과대학학보
ACTA UNIVERSITY MEDICINALIS ANHUI
2015年
4期
519-521,522
,共4页
最小临床意义变化值%Fugl-Meyer运动功能评定量表%脑卒中
最小臨床意義變化值%Fugl-Meyer運動功能評定量錶%腦卒中
최소림상의의변화치%Fugl-Meyer운동공능평정량표%뇌졸중
minimal cinically important differences%Fugl-Meyer motor scale%stroke
目的:建立中文版Fugl-Meyer( FM)运动功能评定量表(上肢部分、下肢部分和总分)用于脑卒中患者运动功能评定的最小临床意义变化值( MCID)。方法同时使用校标法和分布法来确定中文版FM运动功能评定量表的MCID。结果中文版FM运动功能评定量表(上肢部分、下肢部分、总分)的组内重测信度分别为0.997、0.989和0.997,组间重测信度分别为0.993、0.952和0.990, MCID 分别为4.58、3.31和6.0。结论通过本研究获得了中文版FM运动功能评定量表的MCID,有助于临床和科研工作人员识别中文版FM运动功能评定量表用于脑卒中患者运动功能疗效评定的变化值的真实性,能够确定是否符合临床意义的变化。
目的:建立中文版Fugl-Meyer( FM)運動功能評定量錶(上肢部分、下肢部分和總分)用于腦卒中患者運動功能評定的最小臨床意義變化值( MCID)。方法同時使用校標法和分佈法來確定中文版FM運動功能評定量錶的MCID。結果中文版FM運動功能評定量錶(上肢部分、下肢部分、總分)的組內重測信度分彆為0.997、0.989和0.997,組間重測信度分彆為0.993、0.952和0.990, MCID 分彆為4.58、3.31和6.0。結論通過本研究穫得瞭中文版FM運動功能評定量錶的MCID,有助于臨床和科研工作人員識彆中文版FM運動功能評定量錶用于腦卒中患者運動功能療效評定的變化值的真實性,能夠確定是否符閤臨床意義的變化。
목적:건립중문판Fugl-Meyer( FM)운동공능평정량표(상지부분、하지부분화총분)용우뇌졸중환자운동공능평정적최소림상의의변화치( MCID)。방법동시사용교표법화분포법래학정중문판FM운동공능평정량표적MCID。결과중문판FM운동공능평정량표(상지부분、하지부분、총분)적조내중측신도분별위0.997、0.989화0.997,조간중측신도분별위0.993、0.952화0.990, MCID 분별위4.58、3.31화6.0。결론통과본연구획득료중문판FM운동공능평정량표적MCID,유조우림상화과연공작인원식별중문판FM운동공능평정량표용우뇌졸중환자운동공능료효평정적변화치적진실성,능구학정시부부합림상의의적변화。
Objective To determine the minimal clinically important differences ( MCID) of chinese version of the Fugl-Meyer( FM) motor scale for evaluating the motor function of the stroke patients ( upper extremity, lower ex-tremity and total) . Methods The research used anchor-based methods and distribution-based methods together to determine the MCID of chinese version of the FM motor scale. Results The intra-rater retest reliabilities of chinese version of the FM motor scale of motor functions were 0. 997, 0. 989 and 0. 997 for upper extremity, lower extremi-ty, and the total. The inter-rater retest reliabilities were 0. 993, 0. 952 and 0. 990 respectively. The MCID of chi-nese version of FM motor scale were 4. 58 , 3. 31 and 6. 0 . Conclusion The MCID of chinese version of the FM motor scale which could be gained in this study can help both clinical and research staff to identify whether the im-proved effect of motor function, which assessed by chinese version of the FM motor scale, made sense or not in clinical trials or in clinical practice.