水科学进展
水科學進展
수과학진전
2015年
2期
233-242
,共10页
戴云峰%周志芳%赵燕容%吴蓉
戴雲峰%週誌芳%趙燕容%吳蓉
대운봉%주지방%조연용%오용
振荡试验%倾斜承压含水层%倾角%导水系数%贮水系数
振盪試驗%傾斜承壓含水層%傾角%導水繫數%貯水繫數
진탕시험%경사승압함수층%경각%도수계수%저수계수
slug tests%tilt confined aquifer%dip%transmissivity%storage coefficient
为评价振荡试验在获取倾斜承压含水层水文地质参数过程中含水层倾角对计算结果的影响,基于Kipp模型推导了考虑承压含水层倾角的振荡试验解析解模型。倾斜承压含水层量纲一贮水系数和量纲一导水系数不变条件下,测试井?含水层系统的量纲一阻尼系数随着倾角的增加而增加。修正模型计算的量纲一阻尼系数与Kipp模型计算的量纲一阻尼系数偏差10%以上时,必须考虑倾角的影响并且承压含水层倾角对水头响应曲线造成影响临界角度约为34°。修正模型和Kipp模型对现场振荡试验水头响应曲线分析结果的差异表明,忽略含水层倾角会对倾斜承压含水层导水系数和贮水系数的计算结果产生较大误差。
為評價振盪試驗在穫取傾斜承壓含水層水文地質參數過程中含水層傾角對計算結果的影響,基于Kipp模型推導瞭攷慮承壓含水層傾角的振盪試驗解析解模型。傾斜承壓含水層量綱一貯水繫數和量綱一導水繫數不變條件下,測試井?含水層繫統的量綱一阻尼繫數隨著傾角的增加而增加。脩正模型計算的量綱一阻尼繫數與Kipp模型計算的量綱一阻尼繫數偏差10%以上時,必鬚攷慮傾角的影響併且承壓含水層傾角對水頭響應麯線造成影響臨界角度約為34°。脩正模型和Kipp模型對現場振盪試驗水頭響應麯線分析結果的差異錶明,忽略含水層傾角會對傾斜承壓含水層導水繫數和貯水繫數的計算結果產生較大誤差。
위평개진탕시험재획취경사승압함수층수문지질삼수과정중함수층경각대계산결과적영향,기우Kipp모형추도료고필승압함수층경각적진탕시험해석해모형。경사승압함수층량강일저수계수화량강일도수계수불변조건하,측시정?함수층계통적량강일조니계수수착경각적증가이증가。수정모형계산적량강일조니계수여Kipp모형계산적량강일조니계수편차10%이상시,필수고필경각적영향병차승압함수층경각대수두향응곡선조성영향림계각도약위34°。수정모형화Kipp모형대현장진탕시험수두향응곡선분석결과적차이표명,홀략함수층경각회대경사승압함수층도수계수화저수계수적계산결과산생교대오차。
The effect of the dip of an aquifer on the hydrogeological parameters of a tilted confined aquifer was evalua?ted by slug tests. Using the Kipp model, an analytical solution model was derived for the slug tests considering the dip of the tilted confined aquifer. When the dimensionless storage coefficient and inertial parameter were constant, the di?mensionless damped coefficient of the test well?aquifer system increased with increasing dip. When the dimensionless damped coefficient calculated by the modified model differs by 10% than the value calculated by the Kipp model, the effect of the dip should be considered, and the critical dip for affecting the water head response was 34°. The differ?ence in the analytical results between the modified and Kipp models indicates that ignoring the dip of aquifer will cause error in the estimation of the transmissivity and storage coefficient of the tilted confined aquifer.