中国医学创新
中國醫學創新
중국의학창신
MEDICAL INNOVATION OF CHINA
2015年
10期
102-104
,共3页
中西医%结直肠癌%临床疗效
中西醫%結直腸癌%臨床療效
중서의%결직장암%림상료효
Traditional Chinese and western medicine%Colorectal cancer%Curative effect observation
目的：通过探讨中西医结合治疗结直肠癌的临床疗效，旨在为提高患者生活质量并延长生命提供理论依据。方法：选择2012年1月-2013年1月在本院接受治疗的结直肠癌患者112例，随机平均分成研究组和对照组两组，每组各56例患者，对照组给予患者单纯西药化疗治疗，研究组患者在西药化疗的基础上结合中药治疗，对比两组患者近期有效率、复发转移率、不良反应率、疾病进展时间、疼痛评分及生活质量评分。结果：研究组患者近期有效率为80.36%、复发转移率为17.86%、不良反应率为21.43%、疾病进展时间为（12.84±1.03）个月、疼痛评分为（3.41±1.01）分、生活质量评分为（144.51±3.59）分，研究组均显著优于对照组，两组比较差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。结论：中西医结合治疗结直肠癌可以提高治疗近期有效率和患者生活质量、延长患者生命。
目的：通過探討中西醫結閤治療結直腸癌的臨床療效，旨在為提高患者生活質量併延長生命提供理論依據。方法：選擇2012年1月-2013年1月在本院接受治療的結直腸癌患者112例，隨機平均分成研究組和對照組兩組，每組各56例患者，對照組給予患者單純西藥化療治療，研究組患者在西藥化療的基礎上結閤中藥治療，對比兩組患者近期有效率、複髮轉移率、不良反應率、疾病進展時間、疼痛評分及生活質量評分。結果：研究組患者近期有效率為80.36%、複髮轉移率為17.86%、不良反應率為21.43%、疾病進展時間為（12.84±1.03）箇月、疼痛評分為（3.41±1.01）分、生活質量評分為（144.51±3.59）分，研究組均顯著優于對照組，兩組比較差異有統計學意義（P<0.05）。結論：中西醫結閤治療結直腸癌可以提高治療近期有效率和患者生活質量、延長患者生命。
목적：통과탐토중서의결합치료결직장암적림상료효，지재위제고환자생활질량병연장생명제공이론의거。방법：선택2012년1월-2013년1월재본원접수치료적결직장암환자112례，수궤평균분성연구조화대조조량조，매조각56례환자，대조조급여환자단순서약화료치료，연구조환자재서약화료적기출상결합중약치료，대비량조환자근기유효솔、복발전이솔、불량반응솔、질병진전시간、동통평분급생활질량평분。결과：연구조환자근기유효솔위80.36%、복발전이솔위17.86%、불량반응솔위21.43%、질병진전시간위（12.84±1.03）개월、동통평분위（3.41±1.01）분、생활질량평분위（144.51±3.59）분，연구조균현저우우대조조，량조비교차이유통계학의의（P<0.05）。결론：중서의결합치료결직장암가이제고치료근기유효솔화환자생활질량、연장환자생명。
Objective:To discuss the clinical curative effect of combining traditional Chinese and western medicine treatment of colorectal cancer,and to provide the theory basis for improving the quality life of patients and prolong life.Method:112 patients with colorectal cancer were selected in our hospital for treatment from January 2012 to January 2013,and randomly divided into study group and the control group on average in the two groups, each group of 56 patients.The control group patients were given western medicine chemotherapy in the treatment of patients with simple, the study group patients with traditional Chinese medicine treatment based on Western medicine chemotherapy,two groups of patients with recent effective rate, recurrence rate, adverse reaction rate, time to progression, quality of life score and pain score were compared.Result:In study group the effective rate was 80.36%, recurrence and metastasis rate was 17.86%, the rate of adverse reaction was 21.43%, for the time of disease progression were(12.84±1.03) months, pain scores were (3.41±1.01), quality of life scores were (144.51±3.59), the study group was significantly better than the control group, the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion:Combining traditional Chinese and western medicine treatment of colorectal cancer can improve efficiency in recent years and patients’ life quality, prolong patients life.
