CAJ | 학술논문

“二重证据法”的提出推动了古史研究和考古学研究的发展，但是对此方法的滥用也招致了批评之声。对考古学学科特点和考古学发展的社会历史背景进行梳理，可以证明“二重证据法”应用于中国考古学具有合理性和必要性，而有关西方考古学不使用历史文献以保持“纯洁性”的观点是一种误解。本文分析了考古学研究在使用“二重证据法”过程中存在的“滥用”和“不用”现象，指出该方法在考古学研究中的应用范畴和操作程序，认为应该以宽容的心态和严谨的态度采用包括“二重证据法”在内的一切有效的方法，推进中国考古学的新发展。
“이중증거법”적제출추동료고사연구화고고학연구적발전，단시대차방법적람용야초치료비평지성。대고고학학과특점화고고학발전적사회역사배경진행소리，가이증명“이중증거법”응용우중국고고학구유합이성화필요성，이유관서방고고학불사용역사문헌이보지“순길성”적관점시일충오해。본문분석료고고학연구재사용“이중증거법”과정중존재적“람용”화“불용”현상，지출해방법재고고학연구중적응용범주화조작정서，인위응해이관용적심태화엄근적태도채용포괄“이중증거법”재내적일절유효적방법，추진중국고고학적신발전。
Dual attestation promotes the development of researches in ancient history and archaeology, but the abuse of this method has also induced criticism. When sorting out the discipline characteristic of archaeology and historical background of its development, we find dual attestation used in archaeology research is rational and necessary, while the view that keeping purity without using literature in western archaeology is merely a misunderstanding. After analyzing the phenomena of abuse and non-use of dual attestation in archaeological research ,the paper points out the research category and operating procedures of the method. So scholars should be both tolerant and rigorous in using dual attestation and others in order to promote a new development of Chinese archaeology.