科技视界
科技視界
과기시계
Science&Technology Vision
2015年
11期
24-25
,共2页
长江云阳段%单因子水质标识指数%综合水质标识指数%水质评价
長江雲暘段%單因子水質標識指數%綜閤水質標識指數%水質評價
장강운양단%단인자수질표식지수%종합수질표식지수%수질평개
The Yunyang section of Yangtze River%Single factor water quality identification index%Comprehensive water quality identification index%Water quality assessment
于2013年5月至2014年4月对长江云阳段水体的水温、pH值、溶解氧、高锰酸钾指数、氨氮和总磷共6项水质指标进行监测,依据《地表水环境质量标准(GB 3838-2002)》,选取溶解氧、高锰酸钾指数、氨氮和总磷作为水质参数,采用水质标识指数法进行综合水质评价。单因子水质标识指数评价结果表明,总磷为长江云阳段水体主要的水质污染指标,全年超标率为66.7%;溶解氧、氨氮和高锰酸钾指数全年达到Ⅱ类水质标准。综合水质标识指数评价结果表明,长江云阳段水质较稳定,综合水质全年为Ⅱ类,达到水环境功能区目标;平水期、枯水期水质总体优于丰水期。
于2013年5月至2014年4月對長江雲暘段水體的水溫、pH值、溶解氧、高錳痠鉀指數、氨氮和總燐共6項水質指標進行鑑測,依據《地錶水環境質量標準(GB 3838-2002)》,選取溶解氧、高錳痠鉀指數、氨氮和總燐作為水質參數,採用水質標識指數法進行綜閤水質評價。單因子水質標識指數評價結果錶明,總燐為長江雲暘段水體主要的水質汙染指標,全年超標率為66.7%;溶解氧、氨氮和高錳痠鉀指數全年達到Ⅱ類水質標準。綜閤水質標識指數評價結果錶明,長江雲暘段水質較穩定,綜閤水質全年為Ⅱ類,達到水環境功能區目標;平水期、枯水期水質總體優于豐水期。
우2013년5월지2014년4월대장강운양단수체적수온、pH치、용해양、고맹산갑지수、안담화총린공6항수질지표진행감측,의거《지표수배경질량표준(GB 3838-2002)》,선취용해양、고맹산갑지수、안담화총린작위수질삼수,채용수질표식지수법진행종합수질평개。단인자수질표식지수평개결과표명,총린위장강운양단수체주요적수질오염지표,전년초표솔위66.7%;용해양、안담화고맹산갑지수전년체도Ⅱ류수질표준。종합수질표식지수평개결과표명,장강운양단수질교은정,종합수질전년위Ⅱ류,체도수배경공능구목표;평수기、고수기수질총체우우봉수기。
Six water quality indicators, including water temperature, pH, dissolved oxygen, CODMn, ammonia nitrogen and total phosphorus, were monitored in the Yunyang section of Yangtze River from May 2013 to April 2014. Selecting dissolved oxygen, CODMn, ammonia nitrogen and total phosphorus as water quality parameters, the method of water quality identification index was used to assess the water quality status on the basis of environmental quality standards for surface water (GB 3838-2002). The assessment results of single factor water quality identification index showed that total phosphorus was the main water pollution indicator and the rate that exceeded the national standard II was 66.7%, while dissolved oxygen, CODMn and ammonia nitrogen reached the water quality standard of II type water throughout the year. The assessment results of comprehensive water quality identification index showed that the water quality state of this water area was stable, the water quality throughout the year was Grade II, which achieved the goal of water environmental function, and the water quality of common and low water period was generally better than wet water period.