中国CT和MRI杂志
中國CT和MRI雜誌
중국CT화MRI잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF CT AND MRI
2015年
5期
35-38
,共4页
杨宇凌%邹斌%郭永飞%陈菁
楊宇凌%鄒斌%郭永飛%陳菁
양우릉%추빈%곽영비%진정
64层螺旋CT%自动触发扫描%手动触发扫描
64層螺鏇CT%自動觸髮掃描%手動觸髮掃描
64층라선CT%자동촉발소묘%수동촉발소묘
64 Slice Spiral CT%Auto Bolus Triggering Method%Manual Bolus Triggering Method
目的:探讨64层螺旋CT对下肢动脉疾病的评估价值以及64层螺旋CT两种不同扫描方法对下肢动脉显示效果的对照研究。方法41例临床有不同程度症状且初诊疑为下肢动脉疾病的患者,分为两组,19例患者行自动触发扫描,22例患者行手动触发扫描,行64层螺旋CT扫描,根据检查结果判断64层螺旋CT对下肢动脉的评估价值,其根据对下肢动脉的显示效果分别评估后进行对照研究。结果41例患者中38例能显示腹主动脉下段至胫腓动脉全程;19例行自动触发扫描的患者中12例图像质量佳且血管显示清晰,5例部分下肢动脉图像质量欠佳且管壁模糊,2例图像部分下肢动脉图像质量差且无诊断价值;22例行手动触发扫描的患者中5例图像质量佳且血管显示清晰,5例部分下肢动脉图像质量欠佳且管壁模糊,1例图像部分下肢动脉管腔内狭窄程度无法诊断,1例部分下肢动脉节段图像质量差且无诊断价值。结论手动触发扫描对腘动脉远侧下肢动脉显示效果优于自动触发扫描,且64层螺旋CT下肢动脉造影对下肢动脉疾病的诊断具有较好的评估价值。
目的:探討64層螺鏇CT對下肢動脈疾病的評估價值以及64層螺鏇CT兩種不同掃描方法對下肢動脈顯示效果的對照研究。方法41例臨床有不同程度癥狀且初診疑為下肢動脈疾病的患者,分為兩組,19例患者行自動觸髮掃描,22例患者行手動觸髮掃描,行64層螺鏇CT掃描,根據檢查結果判斷64層螺鏇CT對下肢動脈的評估價值,其根據對下肢動脈的顯示效果分彆評估後進行對照研究。結果41例患者中38例能顯示腹主動脈下段至脛腓動脈全程;19例行自動觸髮掃描的患者中12例圖像質量佳且血管顯示清晰,5例部分下肢動脈圖像質量欠佳且管壁模糊,2例圖像部分下肢動脈圖像質量差且無診斷價值;22例行手動觸髮掃描的患者中5例圖像質量佳且血管顯示清晰,5例部分下肢動脈圖像質量欠佳且管壁模糊,1例圖像部分下肢動脈管腔內狹窄程度無法診斷,1例部分下肢動脈節段圖像質量差且無診斷價值。結論手動觸髮掃描對腘動脈遠側下肢動脈顯示效果優于自動觸髮掃描,且64層螺鏇CT下肢動脈造影對下肢動脈疾病的診斷具有較好的評估價值。
목적:탐토64층라선CT대하지동맥질병적평고개치이급64층라선CT량충불동소묘방법대하지동맥현시효과적대조연구。방법41례림상유불동정도증상차초진의위하지동맥질병적환자,분위량조,19례환자행자동촉발소묘,22례환자행수동촉발소묘,행64층라선CT소묘,근거검사결과판단64층라선CT대하지동맥적평고개치,기근거대하지동맥적현시효과분별평고후진행대조연구。결과41례환자중38례능현시복주동맥하단지경비동맥전정;19례행자동촉발소묘적환자중12례도상질량가차혈관현시청석,5례부분하지동맥도상질량흠가차관벽모호,2례도상부분하지동맥도상질량차차무진단개치;22례행수동촉발소묘적환자중5례도상질량가차혈관현시청석,5례부분하지동맥도상질량흠가차관벽모호,1례도상부분하지동맥관강내협착정도무법진단,1례부분하지동맥절단도상질량차차무진단개치。결론수동촉발소묘대객동맥원측하지동맥현시효과우우자동촉발소묘,차64층라선CT하지동맥조영대하지동맥질병적진단구유교호적평고개치。
Objective To discuss the evaluation value of 64 slice spiral CT detecting of lower extremity arteriosclerosis obliterans and compare the effect of two different CT scan methods.Methods 41 patients with different symptoms and firstly diagnosed as lower extremity arteriosclerosis obliterans were divided into two groups.19 patients underwent auto bolus triggering method compared with 22 patients underwent manual bolus triggering method. And the results of the display of lower extremity artery were evaluated within the two groups.Results The images of 38 among 41 patients can show a throughout panorama from the abdominal aorta to the tibia peroneal artery; 5 of the 19 patients underwent auto bolus triggering method got poorer images of the lower extremity artery, and 2 patients among the 5 who got poorer images were distal popliteal artery.5 of the 22 patients underwent manual bolus triggering method got poorer images atproximal popliteal artery.Conclusion The manual bolus triggering method is better than auto bolus triggering method, and lower limb angiography of 64 spiral CT in the diagnosis of lower extremity artery disease is of great value assessment.