华西口腔医学杂志
華西口腔醫學雜誌
화서구강의학잡지
WEST CHINA JOURNAL OF STOMATOLOGY
2015年
2期
153-157
,共5页
李鹏%廖娟%杨孟昌%郭俊
李鵬%廖娟%楊孟昌%郭俊
리붕%료연%양맹창%곽준
右美托咪啶%咪唑安定%麻醉%镇静%种植牙
右美託咪啶%咪唑安定%痳醉%鎮靜%種植牙
우미탁미정%미서안정%마취%진정%충식아
dexmedetomidine%midazolam%anesthesia%sedation%dental implant
目的:比较不同剂量的右美托咪啶与咪唑安定在口腔种植手术患者中的镇静效果。方法选择60例需行口腔种植牙的健康患者,随机分为6组,每组10例。1组(G1)单独使用高剂量咪唑安定;2组(G2)低剂量咪唑安定复合低剂量右美托咪啶;3组(G3)高剂量咪唑安定复合高剂量右美托咪啶;4组(G4)为低剂量咪唑安定复合高剂量右美托咪啶;5组(G5)为高剂量咪唑安定复合低剂量右美托咪啶;6组(G6)单独使用高剂量右美托咪啶。记录各组镇静前、手术中、手术结束时患者血压、心率、血氧饱和度。记录并比较各组局部麻醉(T1)、切开(T2)、备洞(T3)、缝合(T4)时患者Ramsay镇静评分(RSS)以及对T1~T4的记忆情况,离院前进行手术疼痛评分及患者满意度调查。结果 G3组收缩压在T1~T4时均低于G1、G2组(P<0.05);G1组收缩压在T3、T4时高于G6组(P<0.05)。G3组术中心率低于术前(P<0.05)。T1~T4时G1组RSS评分最低;G2组多为2~3分;G3组镇静较深,多例达到5分;G4组以3~4分居多;G5组在T2时开始有部分达到5分;G6组在T1、T2时低于G3、G4、G5组,在T2时接近G4组。各组疼痛评分及麻醉手术满意度比较未见差异。结论联合使用右美托咪啶和咪唑安定镇静优于单独使用,低剂量咪唑安定联合高剂量右美托咪啶镇静效果及程度最满意。
目的:比較不同劑量的右美託咪啶與咪唑安定在口腔種植手術患者中的鎮靜效果。方法選擇60例需行口腔種植牙的健康患者,隨機分為6組,每組10例。1組(G1)單獨使用高劑量咪唑安定;2組(G2)低劑量咪唑安定複閤低劑量右美託咪啶;3組(G3)高劑量咪唑安定複閤高劑量右美託咪啶;4組(G4)為低劑量咪唑安定複閤高劑量右美託咪啶;5組(G5)為高劑量咪唑安定複閤低劑量右美託咪啶;6組(G6)單獨使用高劑量右美託咪啶。記錄各組鎮靜前、手術中、手術結束時患者血壓、心率、血氧飽和度。記錄併比較各組跼部痳醉(T1)、切開(T2)、備洞(T3)、縫閤(T4)時患者Ramsay鎮靜評分(RSS)以及對T1~T4的記憶情況,離院前進行手術疼痛評分及患者滿意度調查。結果 G3組收縮壓在T1~T4時均低于G1、G2組(P<0.05);G1組收縮壓在T3、T4時高于G6組(P<0.05)。G3組術中心率低于術前(P<0.05)。T1~T4時G1組RSS評分最低;G2組多為2~3分;G3組鎮靜較深,多例達到5分;G4組以3~4分居多;G5組在T2時開始有部分達到5分;G6組在T1、T2時低于G3、G4、G5組,在T2時接近G4組。各組疼痛評分及痳醉手術滿意度比較未見差異。結論聯閤使用右美託咪啶和咪唑安定鎮靜優于單獨使用,低劑量咪唑安定聯閤高劑量右美託咪啶鎮靜效果及程度最滿意。
목적:비교불동제량적우미탁미정여미서안정재구강충식수술환자중적진정효과。방법선택60례수행구강충식아적건강환자,수궤분위6조,매조10례。1조(G1)단독사용고제량미서안정;2조(G2)저제량미서안정복합저제량우미탁미정;3조(G3)고제량미서안정복합고제량우미탁미정;4조(G4)위저제량미서안정복합고제량우미탁미정;5조(G5)위고제량미서안정복합저제량우미탁미정;6조(G6)단독사용고제량우미탁미정。기록각조진정전、수술중、수술결속시환자혈압、심솔、혈양포화도。기록병비교각조국부마취(T1)、절개(T2)、비동(T3)、봉합(T4)시환자Ramsay진정평분(RSS)이급대T1~T4적기억정황,리원전진행수술동통평분급환자만의도조사。결과 G3조수축압재T1~T4시균저우G1、G2조(P<0.05);G1조수축압재T3、T4시고우G6조(P<0.05)。G3조술중심솔저우술전(P<0.05)。T1~T4시G1조RSS평분최저;G2조다위2~3분;G3조진정교심,다례체도5분;G4조이3~4분거다;G5조재T2시개시유부분체도5분;G6조재T1、T2시저우G3、G4、G5조,재T2시접근G4조。각조동통평분급마취수술만의도비교미견차이。결론연합사용우미탁미정화미서안정진정우우단독사용,저제량미서안정연합고제량우미탁미정진정효과급정도최만의。
ObjectiveTo?compare?the?sedative?effects?of?different?doses?of?dexmedetomidine?(DEX)?and?midazolam?(MDZ)?in?dental?implant?surgery.?Methods???Sixty?patients?undergoing?dental?implantation?were?selected?and?divided?randomly?into?six?groups?(10?in?each?group).?In?group?1?(G1),?a?highdose?of?MDZ?alone?was?administered?intravenously.?In?group?2?(G2),?a?relatively?low?dose?of?MDZ?and?DEX?was?administered?intravenously.?In?group?3?(G3),?a?highdose?of?MDZ?and?DEX?was?ad-ministered?intravenously.?In?group?4?(G4),?a?lowdose?of?MDZ?and?a?highdose?of?DEX?were?administered.?In?group?5(G5),?a?highdose?of?MDZ?and?a?low?dose?of?DEX?were?administered.?In?group?6?(G6),?a?highdose?of?DEX?alone?was?administered?intravenously.?Blood?pressure?(BP),?heart?rate?(HR),?and?arterial?oxygen?saturation?values?were?measured.?Sedation?was?as-sessed?by?determining?the?Ramsay?sedation?scores(RSS)?during?infiltration?anesthesia?(T1),?incision?(T2),?cutting?(T3),?and?suturing?(T4).?Before?discharging?from?the?hospital,?patients?were?asked?if?they?remembered?the?T1?to?T4?procedures.?The?visual?analogue?scale?(VAS)?and?the?degree?of?patient?satisfaction?were?assessed?at?the?same?time.?Results???In?T1?to?T4,?the?systolic?blood?pressure?(SBP)?in?G3?was?the?lowest?and?was?significantly?different?from?that?in?G1?and?G2?(P<0.05).?In?G1,?the?SBP?was?higher?than?that?in?G6?at?the?T3?and?T4?points?(P<0.05).?HR?was?below?the?preoperative?(P<0.05)?in?the?G3?only.?RSS?was?the?lowest?in?G1?during?the?whole?procedure.?In?G2,?most?patients?obtained?scores?of?2–3.?In?G3,?sedation?was?deeper,?had?more?cases?of?up?to?5.?In?G4,?most?patients?obtained?scores?of?3–4.?In?G5,?some?patients?had?a?score?of?up?to?5.?The?RSS?in?G6?was?lower?than?that?in?G3?and?G4?or?G5?in?T1?to?T2,?closer?to?G4?in?T2.?An?evaluation?of?the?VAS?and?the?degree?of?patient?satisfaction?did?not?show?any?differences?among?the?groups.?Conclusion???The?combination?of?DEX?and?MDZ?is?superior?to?a?single?intravenous?injection.?Low-dose?MDZ?combined?with?high-dose?DEX?achieved?the?highest?quality?of?sedation?in?this?study.