华西口腔医学杂志
華西口腔醫學雜誌
화서구강의학잡지
WEST CHINA JOURNAL OF STOMATOLOGY
2015年
2期
197-200
,共4页
邓娜%何巍%李锐%李文鹿%高宁%张文
鄧娜%何巍%李銳%李文鹿%高寧%張文
산나%하외%리예%리문록%고저%장문
生活质量%口腔癌%外科皮瓣%修复重建外科
生活質量%口腔癌%外科皮瓣%脩複重建外科
생활질량%구강암%외과피판%수복중건외과
quality of life%oral cancer%surgical flaps%reparative and reconstructive surgery
目的:评估应用游离股前外侧穿支皮瓣(ALTF)修复口腔颌面部恶性肿瘤切除术后组织缺损患者的生活质量(QOL)。方法以2012年1月—2013年7月应用ALTF修复口腔颌面部恶性肿瘤切除术后组织缺损的32例患者为研究对象,应用口腔健康影响程度量表(OHIP-14)和简明健康状况调查问卷(SF-36)对患者术后12个月的QOL进行调查和评估。结果 SF-36问卷得分位于前3的项目是躯体疼痛、生理功能和躯体角色,得分分别是78.58±14.82、72.08±27.86和60.00±42.63;得分较低的是情感角色(41.67±39.62)、心理健康(50.75±13.07)和健康变化(54.17±21.75)。分析OHIP-14量表得分,恢复较好的项目是社交障碍和残障,得分分别为34.50±11.32和36.04±12.05;恢复较差的项目是生理性疼痛和心理不适,得分分别为73.50±18.96和60.17±25.66。结论采用ALTF修复口腔颌面部恶性肿瘤切除术后组织缺损,能够恢复患者外形、语言和咀嚼功能的基本需求,提高患者的QOL。
目的:評估應用遊離股前外側穿支皮瓣(ALTF)脩複口腔頜麵部噁性腫瘤切除術後組織缺損患者的生活質量(QOL)。方法以2012年1月—2013年7月應用ALTF脩複口腔頜麵部噁性腫瘤切除術後組織缺損的32例患者為研究對象,應用口腔健康影響程度量錶(OHIP-14)和簡明健康狀況調查問捲(SF-36)對患者術後12箇月的QOL進行調查和評估。結果 SF-36問捲得分位于前3的項目是軀體疼痛、生理功能和軀體角色,得分分彆是78.58±14.82、72.08±27.86和60.00±42.63;得分較低的是情感角色(41.67±39.62)、心理健康(50.75±13.07)和健康變化(54.17±21.75)。分析OHIP-14量錶得分,恢複較好的項目是社交障礙和殘障,得分分彆為34.50±11.32和36.04±12.05;恢複較差的項目是生理性疼痛和心理不適,得分分彆為73.50±18.96和60.17±25.66。結論採用ALTF脩複口腔頜麵部噁性腫瘤切除術後組織缺損,能夠恢複患者外形、語言和咀嚼功能的基本需求,提高患者的QOL。
목적:평고응용유리고전외측천지피판(ALTF)수복구강합면부악성종류절제술후조직결손환자적생활질량(QOL)。방법이2012년1월—2013년7월응용ALTF수복구강합면부악성종류절제술후조직결손적32례환자위연구대상,응용구강건강영향정도량표(OHIP-14)화간명건강상황조사문권(SF-36)대환자술후12개월적QOL진행조사화평고。결과 SF-36문권득분위우전3적항목시구체동통、생리공능화구체각색,득분분별시78.58±14.82、72.08±27.86화60.00±42.63;득분교저적시정감각색(41.67±39.62)、심리건강(50.75±13.07)화건강변화(54.17±21.75)。분석OHIP-14량표득분,회복교호적항목시사교장애화잔장,득분분별위34.50±11.32화36.04±12.05;회복교차적항목시생이성동통화심리불괄,득분분별위73.50±18.96화60.17±25.66。결론채용ALTF수복구강합면부악성종류절제술후조직결손,능구회복환자외형、어언화저작공능적기본수구,제고환자적QOL。
ObjectiveThis?study?aims?to?evaluate?the?quality?of?life?(QOL)?of?patients?who?underwent?resection?of?oral?cancer?and?reconstruction?by?free?anterolateral?thigh?perforator?flaps?(ALTF).?Methods???A?total?of?32?patients?with?oral?and?maxillofacial?malignancies?who?had?undergone?the?resection?of?oral?cancer?and?reconstruction?by?ALTF?were?retrospectively?analyzed.?At?12?months?postoperatively,?the?QOL?of?these?patients?was?assessed?by?using?the?14-item?oral?health?impact?pro-file?(OHIP-14)?and?the?medical?outcome?study?short?form-36?(SF-36)?questionnaires.?Results???A?total?of?32?questionnaires?were?collected.?In?SF-36,?the?highest?scoring?domains?were?bodily?pain?(78.58±14.82),?physical?functioning?(72.08±27.86),?and?the?role?of?physical?(60.00±42.63),?whereas?the?lowest?scoring?domains?were?role-emotional?(41.67±39.62),?followed?by?mental?health?(50.75±13.07)?and?health?transition?(54.17±21.75).?In?OHIP-14,?the?lowest?scoring?domains?were?social?disability?(34.50±11.32)?and?handicap?(36.04±12.05),?indicating?the?functional?recovery?was?better;?and?the?highest?scoring?domains?were?physical?pain?(73.50±18.96)?and?psychological?discomfort?(60.17±20.66),?indicating?the?functional?recovery?was?worse.?Conclusion???The?ALTF?is?an?ideal?selection?for?the?reconstruction?of?oral?defects?after?cancer?resection.?In?using?this?flap,?the?basic?social?need?of?patients?after?surgery?can?be?satisfied.?Moreover,?the?appearance?and?the?functions?of?chewing,?deglu-tition,?and?speech?can?be?restored?in?varying?degrees.?Thus,?ALTF?can?improve?the?patients’?QOL.