海军医学杂志
海軍醫學雜誌
해군의학잡지
JOURNAL OF NAVY MEDICINE
2015年
2期
125-127
,共3页
王志霞%李玄%张柳涵%徐春飞%唐洪钦
王誌霞%李玄%張柳涵%徐春飛%唐洪欽
왕지하%리현%장류함%서춘비%당홍흠
五根管道模式%特重度烧伤%急救%护理
五根管道模式%特重度燒傷%急救%護理
오근관도모식%특중도소상%급구%호리
"Five-tube"mode%Severe burn%Emergency care%Nursing care
目的:研究“五根管道”模式在急诊特重度烧伤患者急救护理中的应用效果。方法2011年1月至2013年1月18例特重度烧伤患者为实验组,在急救护理过程中采用“五根管道”(静脉置管、吸氧管、气管切开管、留置导尿管、留置胃管)模式有序进行急救护理;对照组为2008年1月至2010年12月21例特重度烧伤患者,按传统医嘱执行方法进行急救护理。对2组患者的有效抢救时间进行统计分析。结果实验组建立静脉通道时间(7.7±4.0)min,缺氧改善时间(11.5±6.2)min,早期有效救治时间(35.9±9.5)min,均比对照组缩短,患者死亡率也较对照组降低,2组比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论“五根管道”模式在特重度烧伤患者急救护理中有应用推广价值。
目的:研究“五根管道”模式在急診特重度燒傷患者急救護理中的應用效果。方法2011年1月至2013年1月18例特重度燒傷患者為實驗組,在急救護理過程中採用“五根管道”(靜脈置管、吸氧管、氣管切開管、留置導尿管、留置胃管)模式有序進行急救護理;對照組為2008年1月至2010年12月21例特重度燒傷患者,按傳統醫囑執行方法進行急救護理。對2組患者的有效搶救時間進行統計分析。結果實驗組建立靜脈通道時間(7.7±4.0)min,缺氧改善時間(11.5±6.2)min,早期有效救治時間(35.9±9.5)min,均比對照組縮短,患者死亡率也較對照組降低,2組比較差異均有統計學意義(P<0.01)。結論“五根管道”模式在特重度燒傷患者急救護理中有應用推廣價值。
목적:연구“오근관도”모식재급진특중도소상환자급구호리중적응용효과。방법2011년1월지2013년1월18례특중도소상환자위실험조,재급구호리과정중채용“오근관도”(정맥치관、흡양관、기관절개관、류치도뇨관、류치위관)모식유서진행급구호리;대조조위2008년1월지2010년12월21례특중도소상환자,안전통의촉집행방법진행급구호리。대2조환자적유효창구시간진행통계분석。결과실험조건립정맥통도시간(7.7±4.0)min,결양개선시간(11.5±6.2)min,조기유효구치시간(35.9±9.5)min,균비대조조축단,환자사망솔야교대조조강저,2조비교차이균유통계학의의(P<0.01)。결론“오근관도”모식재특중도소상환자급구호리중유응용추엄개치。
Objective To investigate the effect of "five-tube"treatment mode on emergency care of very severe burn pa-tients.Methods Eighteen very severe burn patients admitted into the hospital from January 2011 to January 2013 were chosen as the experimental group .The"five-tube"( i.e.the intravenous catheter , the oxygen-breathing tube , the tracheotomy tube , the indwelling urinary catheter and the indwelling gastric tube ) treatment mode was applied in the emergency care of the patients .The patients in the control group were 21 very severe burn patients admitted into the hospital from January 2008 to December 2010.They all received con-ventional emergency treatment and nursing care during the whole treatment course .Then, statistical analysis was made on the time of ef-fective emergency care.Results The time for the establishment of intravenous passage was (7.7 ±4.0)min, the time for the improve-ment of hypoxia was(11.5 ±6.2)min, and the time for early effective treatment was (35.9 ±9.5)min, which were all significantly shortened , as compared with those of the control group .Rate of mortality for the experimental group was also significantly reduced , and statistical differences could be seen, when comparisons were made between the 2 groups (P<0.01).Conclusion The "five-tube"treatment mode was worth further clinical extension in the emergency care of severe burn patients .