CAJ | 학술논문

综观中国翻译史，译者对翻译的标准各有所感，由此催生了直译、意译、改编、编译等不同形式的翻译方式。不论何种翻译方式都不可避免地出现不同程度的“叛逆”。只有把握好“适度”原则，译作才能更为广泛地为人接受。试从哲学“度”的角度，通过分析翻译中的两类相对对立现象：“直译”和“改写”，浅谈翻译中的创造性叛逆是另类的忠实。
종관중국번역사，역자대번역적표준각유소감，유차최생료직역、의역、개편、편역등불동형식적번역방식。불론하충번역방식도불가피면지출현불동정도적“반역”。지유파악호“괄도”원칙，역작재능경위엄범지위인접수。시종철학“도”적각도，통과분석번역중적량류상대대립현상：“직역”화“개사”，천담번역중적창조성반역시령류적충실。
Throughout China's translation history, translators hold different views on translation standards, thus gave riseto dif-ferent forms of translation such as literal translation, free translation, adaptation, compilation and so on.However, whatever the translation form is, it is inevitable to have treason to some extent.So in what extent could the translation work be seen as a qualified translation? The author thinks that translation would be widely accepted if we follow the principle of moderation.This essay dis-cussed the creative treason of translation from the perspective of measure in philosophy.through analyzing the two kinds of transla-tion:“literal translation” and“rewriting”.