右江民族医学院学报
右江民族醫學院學報
우강민족의학원학보
JOURNAL OF YOUJIANG MEDICAL COLLEGE FOR NATIONALITIES
2015年
2期
238-239,242
,共3页
方向京%朱飞滨%薛春利%李挺%杨祖贤%徐俊赐
方嚮京%硃飛濱%薛春利%李挺%楊祖賢%徐俊賜
방향경%주비빈%설춘리%리정%양조현%서준사
负压吸疱术%烧伤残余创面%表皮移植
負壓吸皰術%燒傷殘餘創麵%錶皮移植
부압흡포술%소상잔여창면%표피이식
negative pressure suction blister technique%burn remnant wounds%epidermal transplantation
目的:对比分析传统换药方法与负压吸疱术修复烧伤残余创面的临床疗效。方法选取50例烧伤残余创面患者,随机分为实验组(负压吸疱术)和观察组(传统换药),每组25例。比较两组患者治疗后各时间段创面愈合率、分泌物细菌培养阳性率、愈合时间及住院时间,分析不良反应。结果实验组患者治疗后10、15、30 d 内创面愈合率显著高于对照组患者,差异具有统计学意义(P <0.01);创面愈合时间和住院时间较对照组患者均显著缩短,差异具有统计学意义(P <0.001);创面分泌物细菌培养阳性率较对照组患者低,差异具有统计学意义(P <0.001)。治疗过程中均未出现不良反应。结论本次研究表明负压吸疱术修复烧伤残余创面,明显缩短创面愈合时间,减少创面感染,避免感染加深和扩大创面,且安全、可靠,值得进一步在临床上推广应用。
目的:對比分析傳統換藥方法與負壓吸皰術脩複燒傷殘餘創麵的臨床療效。方法選取50例燒傷殘餘創麵患者,隨機分為實驗組(負壓吸皰術)和觀察組(傳統換藥),每組25例。比較兩組患者治療後各時間段創麵愈閤率、分泌物細菌培養暘性率、愈閤時間及住院時間,分析不良反應。結果實驗組患者治療後10、15、30 d 內創麵愈閤率顯著高于對照組患者,差異具有統計學意義(P <0.01);創麵愈閤時間和住院時間較對照組患者均顯著縮短,差異具有統計學意義(P <0.001);創麵分泌物細菌培養暘性率較對照組患者低,差異具有統計學意義(P <0.001)。治療過程中均未齣現不良反應。結論本次研究錶明負壓吸皰術脩複燒傷殘餘創麵,明顯縮短創麵愈閤時間,減少創麵感染,避免感染加深和擴大創麵,且安全、可靠,值得進一步在臨床上推廣應用。
목적:대비분석전통환약방법여부압흡포술수복소상잔여창면적림상료효。방법선취50례소상잔여창면환자,수궤분위실험조(부압흡포술)화관찰조(전통환약),매조25례。비교량조환자치료후각시간단창면유합솔、분비물세균배양양성솔、유합시간급주원시간,분석불량반응。결과실험조환자치료후10、15、30 d 내창면유합솔현저고우대조조환자,차이구유통계학의의(P <0.01);창면유합시간화주원시간교대조조환자균현저축단,차이구유통계학의의(P <0.001);창면분비물세균배양양성솔교대조조환자저,차이구유통계학의의(P <0.001)。치료과정중균미출현불량반응。결론본차연구표명부압흡포술수복소상잔여창면,명현축단창면유합시간,감소창면감염,피면감염가심화확대창면,차안전、가고,치득진일보재림상상추엄응용。
Objective This article aims to compare the efficacy of traditional dressing method and negative pressure suction blister technique for treatment of burn remnant wounds. Methods Fifty burn patients with residual wounds were selected and were randomly divided into an experimental group (n =25,patients received negative pressure suction blister technique)and an observation group (n =25,patients received conventional treatment).The comparison of post-treatment wound healing rate at each time points,the positive- bacteria rate of wound secretion culture,wound healing time and hospitalization duration between the two groups were done and adverse reactions were analyzed. Results Patients in the experimental group had higher post -treatment wound healing rate on 10,15,30 days than those of the control group patients,there were statisti-cally significant differences (P <0.01).The wound healing time and hospitalization duration for the observa-tion group were significantly shorter than those of the control group patients,there were statistically significant differences (P <0.001 );the positive-bacteria rate of wound secretion culture was lower than those of the control group patients,there were statistically significant differences (P <0.001 ).No adverse reactions oc-curred in the two groups during the course of treatment. Conclusion The research results suggest that nega-tive pressure suction blister technique can safely and reliably repair burn remnant wounds,which can signifi-cantly shorten the wound healing time,reduce the wound infection,avoid the wound deepening and widening, and be worthy of further clinical recommendation.