中华现代护理杂志
中華現代護理雜誌
중화현대호리잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF MODERN NURSING
2015年
9期
993-996
,共4页
薛友儒%林平%刘丹%王旖旎%张改%刘莉莉%仰曙芬
薛友儒%林平%劉丹%王旖旎%張改%劉莉莉%仰曙芬
설우유%림평%류단%왕의니%장개%류리리%앙서분
问卷调查%三级医院%新护士%转型冲击
問捲調查%三級醫院%新護士%轉型遲擊
문권조사%삼급의원%신호사%전형충격
Questionnaire investigation%Class-three hospital%Newly graduated nurses%Transition shock
目的:了解新护士转型冲击现状,分析其在转型过程中存在的问题,为制订促进新护士顺利转型的方案提供依据。方法采用新护士转型冲击评价量表对山东省和黑龙江省824名新护士进行问卷调查,观察新护士转型冲击总体得分情况、不同情况的新护士得分比较及新护士转型冲击的影响因素。结果新护士转型冲击总体得分范围为85~135分,其中身体方面维度得分最高为(28.96±1.851)分,得分率为96.53%。不同年龄、工作时间、学历、医院所在地和岗前培训时间的新护士得分比较差异均有统计学意义(F/t值分别为14.715,53.742,28.792,6.911,31.829;P<0.05)。新护士转型冲击的影响因素为工作时间、医院所在地、岗前培训时间与学历,可解释因变量的程度为23.2%。结论新护士转型冲击得分处于较高水平,且受工作时间、学历、医院所在地和岗前培训时间等多方面的影响。
目的:瞭解新護士轉型遲擊現狀,分析其在轉型過程中存在的問題,為製訂促進新護士順利轉型的方案提供依據。方法採用新護士轉型遲擊評價量錶對山東省和黑龍江省824名新護士進行問捲調查,觀察新護士轉型遲擊總體得分情況、不同情況的新護士得分比較及新護士轉型遲擊的影響因素。結果新護士轉型遲擊總體得分範圍為85~135分,其中身體方麵維度得分最高為(28.96±1.851)分,得分率為96.53%。不同年齡、工作時間、學歷、醫院所在地和崗前培訓時間的新護士得分比較差異均有統計學意義(F/t值分彆為14.715,53.742,28.792,6.911,31.829;P<0.05)。新護士轉型遲擊的影響因素為工作時間、醫院所在地、崗前培訓時間與學歷,可解釋因變量的程度為23.2%。結論新護士轉型遲擊得分處于較高水平,且受工作時間、學歷、醫院所在地和崗前培訓時間等多方麵的影響。
목적:료해신호사전형충격현상,분석기재전형과정중존재적문제,위제정촉진신호사순리전형적방안제공의거。방법채용신호사전형충격평개량표대산동성화흑룡강성824명신호사진행문권조사,관찰신호사전형충격총체득분정황、불동정황적신호사득분비교급신호사전형충격적영향인소。결과신호사전형충격총체득분범위위85~135분,기중신체방면유도득분최고위(28.96±1.851)분,득분솔위96.53%。불동년령、공작시간、학력、의원소재지화강전배훈시간적신호사득분비교차이균유통계학의의(F/t치분별위14.715,53.742,28.792,6.911,31.829;P<0.05)。신호사전형충격적영향인소위공작시간、의원소재지、강전배훈시간여학력,가해석인변량적정도위23.2%。결론신호사전형충격득분처우교고수평,차수공작시간、학력、의원소재지화강전배훈시간등다방면적영향。
Objective To investigate and analyze the level of the transition shock of newly graduated nurses, and to provide the basis for improving measures to accelerate the transition period of new nurses. Methods A total of 824 new nurses coming from Shandong Province and Heilongjiang Province were recruited and investigated with the Transition Shock of Newly Graduated Nurses Scale ( TSNGNS) . To observe scores of transition shock in new nurses,scores of different conditions in new nurses and influencing factors on transition shock in new nurses. Results The scores of transition shock of new nurses ranged from 85 to 135. The score of physical were the highest of all (28. 96 ± 1. 851), with a percentage of 96. 53%. There were significant differences in different ages, working time, education levels, hospital areas and pre-service training time ( F/t=14. 715, 53. 742, 28. 792, 6. 911, 31. 829, respectively;P <0. 05). The impact factors of transition shock were working time, hospital area, pre-service time and education level. The degree could explain the dependent variable was 23. 2%. Conclusions The transition shock of new nurse is at a high level, and restrains by working time, education level, the hospital area and pre-service training time.