中华现代护理杂志
中華現代護理雜誌
중화현대호리잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF MODERN NURSING
2015年
8期
938-940
,共3页
黏膜皮肤淋巴结综合征%满意度%集束化护理%小儿
黏膜皮膚淋巴結綜閤徵%滿意度%集束化護理%小兒
점막피부림파결종합정%만의도%집속화호리%소인
Mucocutaneous lymph node syndrome ( MCLS)%Satisfaction%Bundle nursing%Children
目的：比较集束化护理及传统护理在川崎病患儿治疗中的应用效果。方法将120例川崎病患儿采用随机数字表法随机分为研究组及对照组各60例。对照组给予传统护理,研究组在此基础上给予集束化护理,从服务态度、技术能力、关怀沟通、健康教育和病房管理5个部分来分析护理工作的满意度,并分析患者临床指标改善状况。结果研究组患儿在服务态度、技术能力、关怀沟通、健康教育和病房管理5部分的满意度得分分别为(4.24±0.64),(4.37±0.56),(4.28±0.64),(4.34±0.60),(4.34±0.64)分；对照组分别为(3.67±0.83),(3.99±0.81),(3.64±0.81),(3.52±1.10),(3.55±1.04)分,差异有统计学意义(t 值分别为4.21,2.99,4.80,5.07,5.01；P <0.05)。研究组患儿平均退热时间、白细胞含量、C-反应蛋白含量及住院天数分别为(3.67±1.73)d,(9.17±1.79)×109/ L,(30.66±2.81)μg/ ml,(7.39±2.65) d,均明显低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(t 值分别为2.34,5.72,10.42,2.21；P <0.05)。结论集束化护理能显著改善川崎病患儿的治疗及护理状况。
目的：比較集束化護理及傳統護理在川崎病患兒治療中的應用效果。方法將120例川崎病患兒採用隨機數字錶法隨機分為研究組及對照組各60例。對照組給予傳統護理,研究組在此基礎上給予集束化護理,從服務態度、技術能力、關懷溝通、健康教育和病房管理5箇部分來分析護理工作的滿意度,併分析患者臨床指標改善狀況。結果研究組患兒在服務態度、技術能力、關懷溝通、健康教育和病房管理5部分的滿意度得分分彆為(4.24±0.64),(4.37±0.56),(4.28±0.64),(4.34±0.60),(4.34±0.64)分；對照組分彆為(3.67±0.83),(3.99±0.81),(3.64±0.81),(3.52±1.10),(3.55±1.04)分,差異有統計學意義(t 值分彆為4.21,2.99,4.80,5.07,5.01；P <0.05)。研究組患兒平均退熱時間、白細胞含量、C-反應蛋白含量及住院天數分彆為(3.67±1.73)d,(9.17±1.79)×109/ L,(30.66±2.81)μg/ ml,(7.39±2.65) d,均明顯低于對照組,差異有統計學意義(t 值分彆為2.34,5.72,10.42,2.21；P <0.05)。結論集束化護理能顯著改善川崎病患兒的治療及護理狀況。
목적：비교집속화호리급전통호리재천기병환인치료중적응용효과。방법장120례천기병환인채용수궤수자표법수궤분위연구조급대조조각60례。대조조급여전통호리,연구조재차기출상급여집속화호리,종복무태도、기술능력、관부구통、건강교육화병방관리5개부분래분석호리공작적만의도,병분석환자림상지표개선상황。결과연구조환인재복무태도、기술능력、관부구통、건강교육화병방관리5부분적만의도득분분별위(4.24±0.64),(4.37±0.56),(4.28±0.64),(4.34±0.60),(4.34±0.64)분；대조조분별위(3.67±0.83),(3.99±0.81),(3.64±0.81),(3.52±1.10),(3.55±1.04)분,차이유통계학의의(t 치분별위4.21,2.99,4.80,5.07,5.01；P <0.05)。연구조환인평균퇴열시간、백세포함량、C-반응단백함량급주원천수분별위(3.67±1.73)d,(9.17±1.79)×109/ L,(30.66±2.81)μg/ ml,(7.39±2.65) d,균명현저우대조조,차이유통계학의의(t 치분별위2.34,5.72,10.42,2.21；P <0.05)。결론집속화호리능현저개선천기병환인적치료급호리상황。
Objective To compare the application effect of bundle nursing and traditional nursing in children with Kawasaki disease (KD). Methods Totals of 120 KD children had been randomly divided into two groups on average: experimental group and control group. The children were given conventional nursing combined bundle nursing in the experimental group, while the children acquired routine treatment in the control group. Bundle nursing involved service attitude, technical capacity, communication, health education and ward management. The satisfaction degree of nursing job and children clinical index were analyzed. Results The level of the service attitude, technical capacity, communication, health education and ward management were (4. 24 ± 0. 64),(4. 37 ± 0. 56),(4. 28 ± 0. 64),(4. 34 ± 0. 60) and (4. 34 ± 0. 64) respectively in the experimental group and that of them in the control group were (3. 67 ± 0. 83),(3. 99 ± 0. 81), (3. 64 ± 0. 81), (3. 52 ± 1. 10) and (3. 55 ± 1. 04) (t = 4. 21,2. 99,4. 80,5. 07,5. 01, respectively;P < 0. 05). The average time of defervescence, the value of hemameba and C-reactive protein and the days of hospitalization in the experimental group(3. 67 ± 1. 73)d, (9. 17 ± 1. 79) × 109 / L, (30. 66 ± 2. 81) μg/ ml and (7. 39 ± 2. 65) d respectively, which were lower than that of the control group (t = 2. 34,5. 72,10. 42,2. 21, respectively;P <0. 05). Conclusions The bundle nursing can dramatically improve the treatment effect in children with KD.
