中华现代护理杂志
中華現代護理雜誌
중화현대호리잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF MODERN NURSING
2015年
8期
929-931
,共3页
尹艳%尹红%李素芳%付勤%钟春梅
尹豔%尹紅%李素芳%付勤%鐘春梅
윤염%윤홍%리소방%부근%종춘매
抗肿瘤联合化疗方案%小儿%陪护人员%手卫生
抗腫瘤聯閤化療方案%小兒%陪護人員%手衛生
항종류연합화료방안%소인%배호인원%수위생
Antineoplastic combined chemotherapy protocols%Children%Caretakers%Hand hygiene
目的:调查化疗患儿陪护人员手卫生的认知和执行情况,探讨有效的干预对策。方法选择血液肿瘤科化疗患儿的陪护人员60名进行手卫生情况问卷调查,进行六步洗手法培训,跟踪观察洗手执行情况。比较培训前后洗手合格率。结果陪护人员对直接接触患儿、喂药或喂食物前洗手的认知率为88.33%和93.33%,执行率分别为76.67%和89.13%;对于接触患儿相关物品前、与其他人接触后洗手的认知率分别为21.67%和41.67%,执行率分别为14.89%和28.95%。六步洗手法培训前后陪护人员手卫生的菌落数分别为(82.36±53.32),(16.21±18.83)cfu/ cm2,差异有统计学意义(t =9.061, P <0.01);培训后致病菌检出率为31.67%,合格率为61.67%,与培训前比较差异均有统计学意义(χ2值分别为28.420,27.638;P <0.01)。结论化疗患儿陪护人员手卫生认知较低、执行情况差、洗手合格率低,应进一步加强陪护人员手卫生知识的宣传教育和洗手方法培训,督促手卫生的执行,提高陪护人员的洗手合格率,减少经手传播医院感染,保障化疗患儿的健康和安全。
目的:調查化療患兒陪護人員手衛生的認知和執行情況,探討有效的榦預對策。方法選擇血液腫瘤科化療患兒的陪護人員60名進行手衛生情況問捲調查,進行六步洗手法培訓,跟蹤觀察洗手執行情況。比較培訓前後洗手閤格率。結果陪護人員對直接接觸患兒、餵藥或餵食物前洗手的認知率為88.33%和93.33%,執行率分彆為76.67%和89.13%;對于接觸患兒相關物品前、與其他人接觸後洗手的認知率分彆為21.67%和41.67%,執行率分彆為14.89%和28.95%。六步洗手法培訓前後陪護人員手衛生的菌落數分彆為(82.36±53.32),(16.21±18.83)cfu/ cm2,差異有統計學意義(t =9.061, P <0.01);培訓後緻病菌檢齣率為31.67%,閤格率為61.67%,與培訓前比較差異均有統計學意義(χ2值分彆為28.420,27.638;P <0.01)。結論化療患兒陪護人員手衛生認知較低、執行情況差、洗手閤格率低,應進一步加彊陪護人員手衛生知識的宣傳教育和洗手方法培訓,督促手衛生的執行,提高陪護人員的洗手閤格率,減少經手傳播醫院感染,保障化療患兒的健康和安全。
목적:조사화료환인배호인원수위생적인지화집행정황,탐토유효적간예대책。방법선택혈액종류과화료환인적배호인원60명진행수위생정황문권조사,진행륙보세수법배훈,근종관찰세수집행정황。비교배훈전후세수합격솔。결과배호인원대직접접촉환인、위약혹위식물전세수적인지솔위88.33%화93.33%,집행솔분별위76.67%화89.13%;대우접촉환인상관물품전、여기타인접촉후세수적인지솔분별위21.67%화41.67%,집행솔분별위14.89%화28.95%。륙보세수법배훈전후배호인원수위생적균락수분별위(82.36±53.32),(16.21±18.83)cfu/ cm2,차이유통계학의의(t =9.061, P <0.01);배훈후치병균검출솔위31.67%,합격솔위61.67%,여배훈전비교차이균유통계학의의(χ2치분별위28.420,27.638;P <0.01)。결론화료환인배호인원수위생인지교저、집행정황차、세수합격솔저,응진일보가강배호인원수위생지식적선전교육화세수방법배훈,독촉수위생적집행,제고배호인원적세수합격솔,감소경수전파의원감염,보장화료환인적건강화안전。
Objective To investigate hand hygiene awareness and performance for caretakers of children with chemotherapy, and explore effective intervention measures. Methods For 60 caretakers of children with chemotherapy in Hematology Department, we carried out a questionnaire survey of hand hygiene, and tracked the hand washing implementation. Also we carried on a six steps hand washing technique training for the caretakers, then compared and analyzed the hand washing qualified rate before and after the technique training. Results The hand washing cognitive rate of the caretakers when they directly contacting with sick children and before feeding food or medicine for sick children were 88. 33% and 93. 33% , and the implementation rate of those situation were 76. 67% and 89. 13% respectively. In addition, the hand washing cognitive rates of before contacting sick children′s objects and after contacting other people (including other sick children) were just 21. 67% and 41. 67% , and the implementation rates were 14. 89% and 28. 95%respectively. Before and after the six steps hand washing technique training, the bacterial colony count of the caretakers hands were (82. 36 ± 53. 32)cfu/ cm2 and (16. 21 ± 18. 83)cfu/ cm2 (t = 9. 061,P < 0. 01), but after training, the pathogenic bacteria detection rate was 31. 67% and the qualified rates 61. 67% with statistical difference (χ2 = 28. 420,27. 638, respectively; P < 0. 01). Conclusions The hand hygiene cognition for caretakers of children with chemotherapy is relatively low, and the implementation and hand washing qualified rate are unacceptable. The health education propaganda of hand hygiene and hand washing technique training for caretakers should be further strengthen. Hospital should supervise and urge the hand hygiene implementation, in order to improve the hand washing qualified rate of caretakers, reduce the nosocomial infection through hand contact, and protect the health and safety of children with chemotherapy.