长江科学院院报
長江科學院院報
장강과학원원보
JOURNAL OF YANGTZE RIVER SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH INSTITUTE
2015年
5期
127-131,136
,共6页
牛岩%谢良甫%周治宇%王永卫
牛巖%謝良甫%週治宇%王永衛
우암%사량보%주치우%왕영위
极限分析%上限有限元%稳定性分析%强度折减%双曲线迭代
極限分析%上限有限元%穩定性分析%彊度摺減%雙麯線迭代
겁한분석%상한유한원%은정성분석%강도절감%쌍곡선질대
limit analysis%upper bound finite element%stability analysis%strength reduction%hyperbolic iteration
相对于极限平衡法和有限元法来说,极限分析在边坡的稳定性分析中有着更严谨的理论基础和更明确的物理意义,但传统的极限分析上限法为了避免问题成为非线性规划,均是借助于超载系数来进行分析,而工程边坡用得最多的还是强度储备安全系数。针对这一问题,系统地介绍了极限分析上限有限元原理,并将强度折减技术引入到上限法,针对强度折减系数和超载系数满足双曲线的性质,用一种收敛速度更快的双曲线迭代法进行计算,克服了传统强度折减进行人工试算的不足,具有较高的收敛性。通过算例将所提方法与传统极限平衡法和有限元法进行对比,计算结果吻合度较高,说明了本方法的有效性。
相對于極限平衡法和有限元法來說,極限分析在邊坡的穩定性分析中有著更嚴謹的理論基礎和更明確的物理意義,但傳統的極限分析上限法為瞭避免問題成為非線性規劃,均是藉助于超載繫數來進行分析,而工程邊坡用得最多的還是彊度儲備安全繫數。針對這一問題,繫統地介紹瞭極限分析上限有限元原理,併將彊度摺減技術引入到上限法,針對彊度摺減繫數和超載繫數滿足雙麯線的性質,用一種收斂速度更快的雙麯線迭代法進行計算,剋服瞭傳統彊度摺減進行人工試算的不足,具有較高的收斂性。通過算例將所提方法與傳統極限平衡法和有限元法進行對比,計算結果吻閤度較高,說明瞭本方法的有效性。
상대우겁한평형법화유한원법래설,겁한분석재변파적은정성분석중유착경엄근적이론기출화경명학적물리의의,단전통적겁한분석상한법위료피면문제성위비선성규화,균시차조우초재계수래진행분석,이공정변파용득최다적환시강도저비안전계수。침대저일문제,계통지개소료겁한분석상한유한원원리,병장강도절감기술인입도상한법,침대강도절감계수화초재계수만족쌍곡선적성질,용일충수렴속도경쾌적쌍곡선질대법진행계산,극복료전통강도절감진행인공시산적불족,구유교고적수렴성。통과산례장소제방법여전통겁한평형법화유한원법진행대비,계산결과문합도교고,설명료본방법적유효성。
Compared with limit equilibrium method and finite element method,limit analysis has a more rigorous and precise theoretical basis and clearer physical meaning in slope stability analysis.But traditional limit upper bound relies on the overload factor to avoid nonlinear programming whereas most engineering slopes are analyzed by using the factor of strength reduction.In view of this,we introduce the principle of limit upper bound of finite ele-ment analysis and introduce the strength reduction factor into the limit upper bound method.Since the relationship between strength reduction coefficient and overload coefficient is approximately hyperbolic,we present a hyperbolic iteration method to solve the strength reduction factor.This method has a faster convergence speed,and overcomes the shortage of traditional strength reduction method which needs artificial trials.The effectiveness of this method is proved by a numerical example compared with the limit equilibrium method and finite element method.