中国当代医药
中國噹代醫藥
중국당대의약
PERSON
2015年
12期
81-83
,共3页
鼻滴入联合声门注入法%支气管镜检查%临床效果
鼻滴入聯閤聲門註入法%支氣管鏡檢查%臨床效果
비적입연합성문주입법%지기관경검사%림상효과
Nasal drip combined with glottis infusion%Bronchoscope%Clinical effects
目的：探讨鼻滴入联合声门注入法在支气管镜检查中的临床效果。方法对2013年4月~2014年4月来本院诊断、治疗的80例支气管镜检查患者的相关资料进行分析，根据患者不同麻醉方法将其分为实验组和对照组，对照组采用利多卡因鼻咽部喷雾麻醉法麻醉，实验组采用鼻滴入联合声门注入法麻醉，比较两组的麻醉效果。结果实验组麻醉良好率为95.0%，高于对照组的85.0%，差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）；实验组对麻醉效果满意率为95.0%，高于对照组的65.0%，差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。两组手术前心率、血氧饱和度、平均动脉压差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。实验组并发症发生率为15.0%，高于对照组的32.5%（P<0.05）。结论支气管镜在临床上比较常见，患者检查过程中采用鼻滴入联合声门注入法麻醉效果理想，安全、无创，不良反应较少，值得推广应用。
目的：探討鼻滴入聯閤聲門註入法在支氣管鏡檢查中的臨床效果。方法對2013年4月~2014年4月來本院診斷、治療的80例支氣管鏡檢查患者的相關資料進行分析，根據患者不同痳醉方法將其分為實驗組和對照組，對照組採用利多卡因鼻嚥部噴霧痳醉法痳醉，實驗組採用鼻滴入聯閤聲門註入法痳醉，比較兩組的痳醉效果。結果實驗組痳醉良好率為95.0%，高于對照組的85.0%，差異有統計學意義（P<0.05）；實驗組對痳醉效果滿意率為95.0%，高于對照組的65.0%，差異有統計學意義（P<0.05）。兩組手術前心率、血氧飽和度、平均動脈壓差異無統計學意義（P>0.05）。實驗組併髮癥髮生率為15.0%，高于對照組的32.5%（P<0.05）。結論支氣管鏡在臨床上比較常見，患者檢查過程中採用鼻滴入聯閤聲門註入法痳醉效果理想，安全、無創，不良反應較少，值得推廣應用。
목적：탐토비적입연합성문주입법재지기관경검사중적림상효과。방법대2013년4월~2014년4월래본원진단、치료적80례지기관경검사환자적상관자료진행분석，근거환자불동마취방법장기분위실험조화대조조，대조조채용리다잡인비인부분무마취법마취，실험조채용비적입연합성문주입법마취，비교량조적마취효과。결과실험조마취량호솔위95.0%，고우대조조적85.0%，차이유통계학의의（P<0.05）；실험조대마취효과만의솔위95.0%，고우대조조적65.0%，차이유통계학의의（P<0.05）。량조수술전심솔、혈양포화도、평균동맥압차이무통계학의의（P>0.05）。실험조병발증발생솔위15.0%，고우대조조적32.5%（P<0.05）。결론지기관경재림상상비교상견，환자검사과정중채용비적입연합성문주입법마취효과이상，안전、무창，불량반응교소，치득추엄응용。
Objective To explore the clinical effects of nasal drip combined with glottis infusion in bronchoscope. Methods 80 patients taken with bronchoscopy in our hospital from April 2013 to April 2014 were selected,and were di-vided into control group and experimental group according to the different method of anesthesia.The control group were given with anesthesia by nasopharyngeal spray of lidocalne,and the experimental group were given with anesthesia by nasal drip combined with glottis infusion.Anesthetic effect was compared between the two groups. Results The excellent rate of experimental group was 95.0%,higher than 85.0%of control group (P<0.05);the satisfactory rate of experimental group was 95.0%,higher than 65.0%of control group (P<0.05).The heart rate,oxyhemoglobin saturation and mean arteri-al pressure of experimental group between the two groups had no significant difference (P>0.05).The incidence of com-plication in the experimental group was 15.0%,lower than 32.5%in the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion Bronchoscope is clinically common.The anesthetic effect of nasal drip combined with glottis infusion during examination in patients is ideal.The anesthetic method is safe,non-invasive and has fewer adverse effects,which is worthy of promotion and appli-cation.
