中华现代护理杂志
中華現代護理雜誌
중화현대호리잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF MODERN NURSING
2015年
9期
1016-1018,1019
,共4页
胃镜检查%焦虑%诱导表达护理方法
胃鏡檢查%焦慮%誘導錶達護理方法
위경검사%초필%유도표체호리방법
Gastroscopy%Anxiety%Induced expression nursing method
目的:研究诱导表达护理方法对缓解胃镜检查患者焦虑情绪与痛苦体验的作用。方法选择2012年9—11月进行胃镜检查的患者121例,按照随机数字表法随机分为对照组60例与干预组61例,通过生理指标测定、焦虑程度评分、疼痛耐受程度分级研究诱导表达护理方法对受检查心理状态的影响。结果胃镜检查前干预组患者收缩压、舒张压和心率分别为(121.64±11.49),(82.72±15.33)mmHg,(73.53±13.68)次/min,优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(t值分别为4.32,3.25,5.13;P<0.05)。预约时两组患者SAS评分比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),检查前干预组 SAS评分为(52.14±2.79)分,低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(t=2.96,P<0.05)。检查后干预组疼痛耐受程度分级优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论诱导表达护理方法对于缓解胃镜检查者检查前的焦虑情绪、检查时的疼痛体验具有较为明显的改善作用。
目的:研究誘導錶達護理方法對緩解胃鏡檢查患者焦慮情緒與痛苦體驗的作用。方法選擇2012年9—11月進行胃鏡檢查的患者121例,按照隨機數字錶法隨機分為對照組60例與榦預組61例,通過生理指標測定、焦慮程度評分、疼痛耐受程度分級研究誘導錶達護理方法對受檢查心理狀態的影響。結果胃鏡檢查前榦預組患者收縮壓、舒張壓和心率分彆為(121.64±11.49),(82.72±15.33)mmHg,(73.53±13.68)次/min,優于對照組,差異有統計學意義(t值分彆為4.32,3.25,5.13;P<0.05)。預約時兩組患者SAS評分比較差異無統計學意義(P>0.05),檢查前榦預組 SAS評分為(52.14±2.79)分,低于對照組,差異有統計學意義(t=2.96,P<0.05)。檢查後榦預組疼痛耐受程度分級優于對照組,差異有統計學意義(P<0.05)。結論誘導錶達護理方法對于緩解胃鏡檢查者檢查前的焦慮情緒、檢查時的疼痛體驗具有較為明顯的改善作用。
목적:연구유도표체호리방법대완해위경검사환자초필정서여통고체험적작용。방법선택2012년9—11월진행위경검사적환자121례,안조수궤수자표법수궤분위대조조60례여간예조61례,통과생리지표측정、초필정도평분、동통내수정도분급연구유도표체호리방법대수검사심리상태적영향。결과위경검사전간예조환자수축압、서장압화심솔분별위(121.64±11.49),(82.72±15.33)mmHg,(73.53±13.68)차/min,우우대조조,차이유통계학의의(t치분별위4.32,3.25,5.13;P<0.05)。예약시량조환자SAS평분비교차이무통계학의의(P>0.05),검사전간예조 SAS평분위(52.14±2.79)분,저우대조조,차이유통계학의의(t=2.96,P<0.05)。검사후간예조동통내수정도분급우우대조조,차이유통계학의의(P<0.05)。결론유도표체호리방법대우완해위경검사자검사전적초필정서、검사시적동통체험구유교위명현적개선작용。
Objective To research the effect of the induced expression nursing method on anxiety and pain experience in gastroscopy patients. Methods A total of 121 patients from September to November 2012 were selected and randomly divided into the control group ( 60 patients ) and the intervention group (61 patients). The physiological indicators, anxiety score, and pain tolerance were measured and compared between the two groups. Results The systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure and heart rate in the intervention group before gastroscopy were (121.64 ±11.49), (82.72 ±15.33)mmHg and (73.53 ±13.68) times/min,which were significantly better than those of the control group (t=4. 32, 3. 25, 5. 13, respectively;P<0. 05). There was no significant difference in SAS scores when making the test reservation between the two groups (P>0. 05). The SAS scores in the intervention group before gastroscopy was (52. 14 ± 2. 79), which was significantly lower than that of the control group (t=2. 96,P<0. 05). After gastroscopy, the pain tolerance grading was significantly better than that of the control group (P<0. 05). Conclusions The induced expression nursing method can effectively reduce the patients′anxiety and pain experience to gastroscopy.