成都理工大学学报(社会科学版)
成都理工大學學報(社會科學版)
성도리공대학학보(사회과학판)
JOURNAL OF CHENGDU UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY(SOCIAL SCIENCES)
2015年
3期
27-31
,共5页
绑架罪%抢劫罪%当场%法益侵害
綁架罪%搶劫罪%噹場%法益侵害
방가죄%창겁죄%당장%법익침해
kidnapping%robbery%caught%violating legal interests
当场劫持人质或索取财物以及周围是否存在“近亲属般切身忧虑者”,都不是绑架罪与抢劫罪的界限,只要侵犯了第三人的自决权,就应当以绑架罪定罪。当场劫持人质的法益侵害性要比典型的绑架罪要轻,绑架罪的社会危害性还体现在其所带来的社会负面效应,即群众所产生的恐惧心理。
噹場劫持人質或索取財物以及週圍是否存在“近親屬般切身憂慮者”,都不是綁架罪與搶劫罪的界限,隻要侵犯瞭第三人的自決權,就應噹以綁架罪定罪。噹場劫持人質的法益侵害性要比典型的綁架罪要輕,綁架罪的社會危害性還體現在其所帶來的社會負麵效應,即群衆所產生的恐懼心理。
당장겁지인질혹색취재물이급주위시부존재“근친속반절신우필자”,도불시방가죄여창겁죄적계한,지요침범료제삼인적자결권,취응당이방가죄정죄。당장겁지인질적법익침해성요비전형적방가죄요경,방가죄적사회위해성환체현재기소대래적사회부면효응,즉군음소산생적공구심리。
on the spot hostage-taking or ask for bribes and surrounding the existence of “close relatives like personal cares”, boundaries are not the crime of kidnapping and robbery,as long as the violation of the third people ’s right to self-determination,it should be in the crime of kidnapping conviction.On the spothostage-taking law profit violated lighter than typical kidnapping crime,the social harmfulness of the crime of kidnapping is also reflected in the social and the negative effect it has,i.e.the resulting fear.