CAJ | 학술논문

目的：比较不同根充糊剂在根管治疗中的应用效果。方法选取本院2012年1月~2013年1月收治的接受根管充填治疗的患者68例作为研究对象，将患者随机分成两组，对照组给予氢氧化钙根管充填糊剂，实验组采用美松糊剂，对比两组的临床疗效。结果实验组的总有效率为94.12豫，对照组为91.18豫，两组比较，差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)；实验组的3、4级疼痛发生率为8.82豫，明显低于对照组的32.35%(P<0.05)。结论在根管治疗中，氢氧化钙根管充填糊剂、美松糊剂均可获取较为满意的临床效果，但后者在缓解疼痛上更具临床优势，值得临床积极推广。
목적：비교불동근충호제재근관치료중적응용효과。방법선취본원2012년1월~2013년1월수치적접수근관충전치료적환자68례작위연구대상，장환자수궤분성량조，대조조급여경양화개근관충전호제，실험조채용미송호제，대비량조적림상료효。결과실험조적총유효솔위94.12예，대조조위91.18예，량조비교，차이무통계학의의(P>0.05)；실험조적3、4급동통발생솔위8.82예，명현저우대조조적32.35%(P<0.05)。결론재근관치료중，경양화개근관충전호제、미송호제균가획취교위만의적림상효과，단후자재완해동통상경구림상우세，치득림상적겁추엄。
Objective To compare application effect of different root canal filling paste in root canal therapy. Methods From January 2012 to January 2013,68 patients accepted root canal filling therapy in our hospital were selected as re-search objects and they were randomly divided into two groups.In control group,calcium hydroxide root canal filling paste was used,while in experimental group, dexamethasone paste was applied.The clinical efficacy between two groups was compared. Results The total effective rate in experimental group and control group was 94.12% and 91.18% re-spectively,which didn’t show a statistical difference (P>0.05).The incidence rate of 3,4 level of pain in experimental group (8.82%) was obviously lower than that of control group (32.35%) (P<0.05). Conclusion In the root canal therapy, both calcium hydroxide root canal filling paste and dexamethasone paste can obtain satisfactory therapeutic effect in clinic,but the latter gets superiority in alleviating pain,which is worthy of positive promotion in clinic.