河北医学
河北醫學
하북의학
HEBEI MEDICINE
2015年
8期
1388-1390
,共3页
压塑成形OA%CPAP%OSAS%临床疗效
壓塑成形OA%CPAP%OSAS%臨床療效
압소성형OA%CPAP%OSAS%림상료효
Compression molding OA%CPAP%OSAS%Clinical efficacy
目的:探讨压塑成形口腔矫治器( OA)与CPAP 治疗阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合征( OS-AS)的临床疗效。方法:收集2012年9月至2014年9月于我院接受治疗的OSAS患者80例,按照随机数字表格法随机分为CPAP组与压塑成形OA组,各40例,分别给予CPAP 与压塑成形口腔矫治器治疗,随访6个月,比较两组患者多导睡眠图( PSG)变化及临床症状。结果:治疗后两组患者呼吸暂停平均时间、低通气指数、暂停指数、最低血氧饱和度比较差异具有统计学意义(P 均<0.05),组间比较差异无统计学意义( P>0.05)。两组患者治疗期间的舒适度比较差异具有统计学意义(χ2=9.64,P<0.05)。结论:OA与CPAP 治疗OSAS的临床疗效相似,建议两种方法交替应用,可有效改善患者病情,值得临床推广及应用。
目的:探討壓塑成形口腔矯治器( OA)與CPAP 治療阻塞性睡眠呼吸暫停綜閤徵( OS-AS)的臨床療效。方法:收集2012年9月至2014年9月于我院接受治療的OSAS患者80例,按照隨機數字錶格法隨機分為CPAP組與壓塑成形OA組,各40例,分彆給予CPAP 與壓塑成形口腔矯治器治療,隨訪6箇月,比較兩組患者多導睡眠圖( PSG)變化及臨床癥狀。結果:治療後兩組患者呼吸暫停平均時間、低通氣指數、暫停指數、最低血氧飽和度比較差異具有統計學意義(P 均<0.05),組間比較差異無統計學意義( P>0.05)。兩組患者治療期間的舒適度比較差異具有統計學意義(χ2=9.64,P<0.05)。結論:OA與CPAP 治療OSAS的臨床療效相似,建議兩種方法交替應用,可有效改善患者病情,值得臨床推廣及應用。
목적:탐토압소성형구강교치기( OA)여CPAP 치료조새성수면호흡잠정종합정( OS-AS)적림상료효。방법:수집2012년9월지2014년9월우아원접수치료적OSAS환자80례,안조수궤수자표격법수궤분위CPAP조여압소성형OA조,각40례,분별급여CPAP 여압소성형구강교치기치료,수방6개월,비교량조환자다도수면도( PSG)변화급림상증상。결과:치료후량조환자호흡잠정평균시간、저통기지수、잠정지수、최저혈양포화도비교차이구유통계학의의(P 균<0.05),조간비교차이무통계학의의( P>0.05)。량조환자치료기간적서괄도비교차이구유통계학의의(χ2=9.64,P<0.05)。결론:OA여CPAP 치료OSAS적림상료효상사,건의량충방법교체응용,가유효개선환자병정,치득림상추엄급응용。
Objective:To investigate the clinical efficacy of compression molding oral appliance( OA) and CPAP in treatment of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome( OSAS) .Method:80 cases with OSAS were se-lected from our hospital during the period from Sep.2012 to Sep.2014, they were randomly divided into CPAP group and compression molding OA group according to a random number table method, 40 cases in each group, they were given CPAP and compression molding oral appliance, followed up for 6 months, poly-somnography ( PSG) changes and clinical symptoms of two groups were compared.Result:The average time of apnea, hypopnea index, apnea index, the lowest oxygen saturation after treatment of two groups had statis-tically significant( P <0.05) , there were no statistically significant between two groups ( P>0.05) .Comfort during treatment of two groups had statistically significant(χ2=9.64,P<0.05).Conclusion:OA and CPAP in treatment of OSAS has similar clinical efficacy, recommends the two methods used alternately, can effec-tively improve the patient's condition, worthy of promotion and application in clinical.