CAJ | 학술논문

目的：通过与强迫症患者比较，探讨伴与不伴敏感性关系妄想的社交恐怖症患者的人格特征及症状特点方法：对83例伴与不伴敏感性关系妄想的社交恐怖症、强迫症患者进行艾森克人格问卷（EPQ）、症状自评量表（SCL-90）的检测评定。对3组患者间的人格以及症状进行比较。结果：SCL-90结果中，总分、躯体化因子、强迫因子、人际敏感因子、焦虑因子、精神病因子在3组之间的差异有统计学意义（P均<0.05），其余因子间的差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。EPQ结果中，3组间内外向因子分差异有统计学意义（P<0.05），但精神病性、神经质及掩饰因子分差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。结论：与不伴有敏感性关系妄想的社交恐怖症患者相比，伴有敏感性关系妄想的社交恐怖症患者与强迫症患者有更加相似的人格特征，并且在症状的严重程度方面，也更有相似性。
목적：통과여강박증환자비교，탐토반여불반민감성관계망상적사교공포증환자적인격특정급증상특점방법：대83례반여불반민감성관계망상적사교공포증、강박증환자진행애삼극인격문권（EPQ）、증상자평량표（SCL-90）적검측평정。대3조환자간적인격이급증상진행비교。결과：SCL-90결과중，총분、구체화인자、강박인자、인제민감인자、초필인자、정신병인자재3조지간적차이유통계학의의（P균<0.05），기여인자간적차이무통계학의의（P>0.05）。EPQ결과중，3조간내외향인자분차이유통계학의의（P<0.05），단정신병성、신경질급엄식인자분차이무통계학의의（P>0.05）。결론：여불반유민감성관계망상적사교공포증환자상비，반유민감성관계망상적사교공포증환자여강박증환자유경가상사적인격특정，병차재증상적엄중정도방면，야경유상사성。
Objective:To investigate the personality and symptom characteristics in social phobia pa-tients with or without sensitive delusion of reference by comparing to the patients with obsessive compulsive dis-order. Method:Eighty-three cases were investigated with Eysenck personality questionnaire(EPQ)and symp-tom checklist(SCL-90),including 28 cases of social phobia with sensitive delusion of reference,25 cases of so-cial phobia without sensitive delusion of reference and 30 cases of obsessive-compulsive disorder. The results of the 3 groups were analyzed and compared with each other. Results:The differences of somatization factor,co-ercive factor,interpersonal sensitivity factor,anxiety factor,psychic syndrome factor and total score in SCL-90 in 3 groups were significant(P<0.05)but no significant difference was found in other factors of SCL-90(P>0. 05). The difference of E factor in EPQ in 3 groups was significant(P<0. 05)but no significant difference was found in P,N and L factors(P>0. 05). Conclusion:Social phobia patients with sensitive delusion of reference have more similar personality and syptom characteristics with obsessive compulsive disorder patients.