临床精神医学杂志
臨床精神醫學雜誌
림상정신의학잡지
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE
2015年
2期
99-101
,共3页
睡眠%认知%失眠%信念与态度
睡眠%認知%失眠%信唸與態度
수면%인지%실면%신념여태도
sleep%awareness%insomnia%beliefandattitude
目的:比较抑郁症与失眠症患者的睡眠个人信念和态度。方法:采用睡眠个人信念与态度量表简化版( DBAS-16)和匹兹堡睡眠质量指数( PSQI)对56例抑郁症患者和49例失眠症患者、42名正常对照者进行测评。结果:正常组PQSI总分及因子分均低于抑郁组和失眠组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);抑郁组PQSI日间功能因子分(2.59±0.78)高于失眠组(2.08±1.02),差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05),PQSI总分及其他因子分差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);正常组的DBAS总分及因子分均高于抑郁组,且正常组DBAS总分及成分因子“对失眠后果的估计”、“对睡眠的担忧”和“对药物的认知”3个因子分高于失眠组,差异均有统计学意义( P均<0.01);抑郁组与失眠组,DBAS总分及各因子分差异均无统计学意义( P>0.05);抑郁组和失眠组的DBAS总分及因子分与PQSI总分及因子分分别存在不同的相关性。结论:与正常组相比,失眠组与抑郁组均存在不良的睡眠信念与态度成分,但未发现抑郁症与失眠症患者的不合理睡眠认知之间有差异。
目的:比較抑鬱癥與失眠癥患者的睡眠箇人信唸和態度。方法:採用睡眠箇人信唸與態度量錶簡化版( DBAS-16)和匹玆堡睡眠質量指數( PSQI)對56例抑鬱癥患者和49例失眠癥患者、42名正常對照者進行測評。結果:正常組PQSI總分及因子分均低于抑鬱組和失眠組,差異均有統計學意義(P<0.05);抑鬱組PQSI日間功能因子分(2.59±0.78)高于失眠組(2.08±1.02),差異均有統計學意義(P<0.05),PQSI總分及其他因子分差異均無統計學意義(P>0.05);正常組的DBAS總分及因子分均高于抑鬱組,且正常組DBAS總分及成分因子“對失眠後果的估計”、“對睡眠的擔憂”和“對藥物的認知”3箇因子分高于失眠組,差異均有統計學意義( P均<0.01);抑鬱組與失眠組,DBAS總分及各因子分差異均無統計學意義( P>0.05);抑鬱組和失眠組的DBAS總分及因子分與PQSI總分及因子分分彆存在不同的相關性。結論:與正常組相比,失眠組與抑鬱組均存在不良的睡眠信唸與態度成分,但未髮現抑鬱癥與失眠癥患者的不閤理睡眠認知之間有差異。
목적:비교억욱증여실면증환자적수면개인신념화태도。방법:채용수면개인신념여태도량표간화판( DBAS-16)화필자보수면질량지수( PSQI)대56례억욱증환자화49례실면증환자、42명정상대조자진행측평。결과:정상조PQSI총분급인자분균저우억욱조화실면조,차이균유통계학의의(P<0.05);억욱조PQSI일간공능인자분(2.59±0.78)고우실면조(2.08±1.02),차이균유통계학의의(P<0.05),PQSI총분급기타인자분차이균무통계학의의(P>0.05);정상조적DBAS총분급인자분균고우억욱조,차정상조DBAS총분급성분인자“대실면후과적고계”、“대수면적담우”화“대약물적인지”3개인자분고우실면조,차이균유통계학의의( P균<0.01);억욱조여실면조,DBAS총분급각인자분차이균무통계학의의( P>0.05);억욱조화실면조적DBAS총분급인자분여PQSI총분급인자분분별존재불동적상관성。결론:여정상조상비,실면조여억욱조균존재불량적수면신념여태도성분,단미발현억욱증여실면증환자적불합리수면인지지간유차이。
Objective:To analyze the differences in personal beliefs about and attitude to sleep between patients with depression and insomnia disorder. Method:56 depressive patients、49 insomniacs and 42 good sleepers were measured by dysfunctional beliefs and attitudes about sleep scale(DBAS-16)and Pittsburgh sleep quality index( PSQI). Results:The total and all factor scores of PQSI for the good sleepers were significantly lower than that for the patients with depression and insomnia(P<0. 05);then compared the depressive patients and insomniacs,the day function of PQSI for the depressive patients(2. 59 ± 0. 78)were significantly higher than that for the insomniacs(2. 08 ± 1. 02)(P<0. 05),the two groups showed no significant difference on PQSI total and the other factor scores(P>0. 05);the total and all factor scores of DBAS for the good sleepers were signifi-cantly higher than that for the patients with depression and insomnia(P<0. 05),the total score and the“conse-quences caused by insomnia”,“worries about sleep”,“the knowledge of drug”of DBAS were significantly high-er in good sleepers than insomniacs(P<0. 05);the depressive patients and insomniacs showed no significant difference on DBAS total and all factor scores(P>0. 05);The total and factor scores of PQSI and DBAS had different correlation in both the depressive patients and insomniacs. Conclusion:compared with good sleep-ers,patients with depression and insomnia have more wrong beliefs about and attitude towards sleep,but there were no significant differences on the sleep cognition between insomnia and depression group.