土木建筑与环境工程
土木建築與環境工程
토목건축여배경공정
JOURNAL OF CIVIL, ARCHITECTURAL & ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING
2015年
2期
1-7
,共7页
陈冲%袁行飞%段元锋%钱若军
陳遲%袁行飛%段元鋒%錢若軍
진충%원행비%단원봉%전약군
Euler梁%Timoshenko梁%精细梁%向量式有限元%高跨比
Euler樑%Timoshenko樑%精細樑%嚮量式有限元%高跨比
Euler량%Timoshenko량%정세량%향량식유한원%고과비
Euler beam model%Timoshenko beam model%fine beam model%VFIFE%depth-span ratio
精细梁不同于Euler梁和Timoshenko梁,该模型在考虑剪切变形的同时还考虑了横向弯曲时截面转动产生的附加轴向位移及横向剪切变形影响截面抗弯刚度后产生的附加横向位移。推导了适用于向量式有限元分析的精细梁单元应变和内力表达式,采用FORTRAN自编了向量式有限元程序。对悬臂梁、两端固支梁和门式框架进行了算例分析,对比了采用不同梁单元模型下结构的竖向位移。结果表明:当高跨比较小时,3种梁单元的竖向位移相差不大;当高跨比较大时,精细梁单元的竖向位移较 Euler梁和Timoshenko梁明显增大,表明剪切变形及刚度折减引起的附加轴向位移、附加横向位移不能忽略。精细梁单元模型对高跨比较大的梁进行分析可望得到更精确的结果。
精細樑不同于Euler樑和Timoshenko樑,該模型在攷慮剪切變形的同時還攷慮瞭橫嚮彎麯時截麵轉動產生的附加軸嚮位移及橫嚮剪切變形影響截麵抗彎剛度後產生的附加橫嚮位移。推導瞭適用于嚮量式有限元分析的精細樑單元應變和內力錶達式,採用FORTRAN自編瞭嚮量式有限元程序。對懸臂樑、兩耑固支樑和門式框架進行瞭算例分析,對比瞭採用不同樑單元模型下結構的豎嚮位移。結果錶明:噹高跨比較小時,3種樑單元的豎嚮位移相差不大;噹高跨比較大時,精細樑單元的豎嚮位移較 Euler樑和Timoshenko樑明顯增大,錶明剪切變形及剛度摺減引起的附加軸嚮位移、附加橫嚮位移不能忽略。精細樑單元模型對高跨比較大的樑進行分析可望得到更精確的結果。
정세량불동우Euler량화Timoshenko량,해모형재고필전절변형적동시환고필료횡향만곡시절면전동산생적부가축향위이급횡향전절변형영향절면항만강도후산생적부가횡향위이。추도료괄용우향량식유한원분석적정세량단원응변화내력표체식,채용FORTRAN자편료향량식유한원정서。대현비량、량단고지량화문식광가진행료산례분석,대비료채용불동량단원모형하결구적수향위이。결과표명:당고과비교소시,3충량단원적수향위이상차불대;당고과비교대시,정세량단원적수향위이교 Euler량화Timoshenko량명현증대,표명전절변형급강도절감인기적부가축향위이、부가횡향위이불능홀략。정세량단원모형대고과비교대적량진행분석가망득도경정학적결과。
The proposed fine beam model is different from that of Euler beam and Timoshenko beam .Some effects were considered in the new model such as shear displacement ,the additional axial displacement produced by lateral bending and the additional transverse displacement produced by reduced stiffness due to transverse shear deformation .The formula of strain and internal force of the fine beam model ,applied to Vector Form Intrinsic Finite Element (VFIFE ) analysis ,were derived and corresponding programs were developed by Fortran language . Cantilever beam ,both ends clamped beam and portal frame are analyzed and the vertical displacements were compared using different beam element models .Numerical results showed that when the depth‐span ratio was relatively small ,the vertical displacements obtained by different beam model had slight difference .When the depth‐span ratio was larger ,the vertical displacement obtained by the fine beam model was obviously larger than that obtained by the Euler beam and Timoshenko beam . Therefore ,the shear displacement ,the additional axial displacement and the additional transverse displacement caused by stiffness reduction should not be ignored when the deep beam was analyzed .The new beam model proposed in this paper demonstrated more accurate results when the beam had a large depth‐span ratio .