中国实用医药
中國實用醫藥
중국실용의약
CHINA PRACTICAL MEDICAL
2015年
13期
30-31
,共2页
CT诊断%中心型肺癌%价值分析
CT診斷%中心型肺癌%價值分析
CT진단%중심형폐암%개치분석
CT diagnosis%Central type lung cancer%Value analysis
目的：探讨CT诊断中心型肺癌的价值。方法64例中心型肺癌患者，随机分为实验组和对照组，各32例。实验组采用CT诊断，对照组采用手术病理诊断，观察两组患者的诊断结果。结果比较两组患者的诊断率，差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)；两组患者的诊断结果基本相同，差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论CT诊断中心型肺癌的诊断率高，对患者无创伤，是一种安全的诊断技术，值得临床推广。
目的：探討CT診斷中心型肺癌的價值。方法64例中心型肺癌患者，隨機分為實驗組和對照組，各32例。實驗組採用CT診斷，對照組採用手術病理診斷，觀察兩組患者的診斷結果。結果比較兩組患者的診斷率，差異無統計學意義(P>0.05)；兩組患者的診斷結果基本相同，差異無統計學意義(P>0.05)。結論CT診斷中心型肺癌的診斷率高，對患者無創傷，是一種安全的診斷技術，值得臨床推廣。
목적：탐토CT진단중심형폐암적개치。방법64례중심형폐암환자，수궤분위실험조화대조조，각32례。실험조채용CT진단，대조조채용수술병리진단，관찰량조환자적진단결과。결과비교량조환자적진단솔，차이무통계학의의(P>0.05)；량조환자적진단결과기본상동，차이무통계학의의(P>0.05)。결론CT진단중심형폐암적진단솔고，대환자무창상，시일충안전적진단기술，치득림상추엄。
Objective To investigate the value of CT diagnosis for central type lung cancer. Methods A total of 64 patients with central type lung cancer were randomly divided into experimental group and control group, with 32 cases in each group. The experimental group received CT diagnosis, and the control group received surgical pathology diagnosis. Diagnosis results of the two groups were observed.Results Comparison of diagnosis rates between the two groups showed no statistically significant difference (P>0.05). Diagnosis results in the two groups were similar, and their difference had no statistical significance (P>0.05).Conclusion CT diagnosis provides high diagnosis rate without trauma for patients with central type lung cancer. It is a safe diagnosis method and it worth clinical promotion.
