中国伤残医学
中國傷殘醫學
중국상잔의학
CHINESE JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND DISABILITY MEDICINE
2015年
9期
4-6
,共3页
人工关节治疗技术%创伤骨科%术后疼痛%Lysholm评分
人工關節治療技術%創傷骨科%術後疼痛%Lysholm評分
인공관절치료기술%창상골과%술후동통%Lysholm평분
Artificial joint treatment technologies%Traumatic orthopedic%Postoperative pain%Lysholm scale
目的：探讨人工关节治疗技术对创伤骨科患者术后疼痛、Lysholm评分的影响。方法：选取我院于2013年3月～2014年8月收治的58例股骨颈骨折患者为研究对象，乱数表法随机分成复位内固定组（B组，n＝29）和人工关节置换术（A组，n＝29）2组。记录其术后VAS（疼痛评分）及Lysholm（膝关节评分）结果。结果：（1）治疗后，2组VAS评分结果均较治疗前降低（P＜0．05），且A组疼痛指数降低幅度大于B组（P＜0．05）；（2）治疗前，2组膝关节评估情况对比无统计学意义（P＞0．05）；治疗后，A组优良率为79．31％，明显高于B组的48．28％，组间对比差异明显（ P＜0．05）；（3） A组术后生活质量评估BP、MH及GH3项标准均高于B组，对比差异明显（ P＜0．05）。结论：对股骨颈骨折患者行人工关节置换术，疗效显著，可助患者尽快恢复膝关节功能、减轻痛苦，值得临床推广。
目的：探討人工關節治療技術對創傷骨科患者術後疼痛、Lysholm評分的影響。方法：選取我院于2013年3月～2014年8月收治的58例股骨頸骨摺患者為研究對象，亂數錶法隨機分成複位內固定組（B組，n＝29）和人工關節置換術（A組，n＝29）2組。記錄其術後VAS（疼痛評分）及Lysholm（膝關節評分）結果。結果：（1）治療後，2組VAS評分結果均較治療前降低（P＜0．05），且A組疼痛指數降低幅度大于B組（P＜0．05）；（2）治療前，2組膝關節評估情況對比無統計學意義（P＞0．05）；治療後，A組優良率為79．31％，明顯高于B組的48．28％，組間對比差異明顯（ P＜0．05）；（3） A組術後生活質量評估BP、MH及GH3項標準均高于B組，對比差異明顯（ P＜0．05）。結論：對股骨頸骨摺患者行人工關節置換術，療效顯著，可助患者儘快恢複膝關節功能、減輕痛苦，值得臨床推廣。
목적：탐토인공관절치료기술대창상골과환자술후동통、Lysholm평분적영향。방법：선취아원우2013년3월～2014년8월수치적58례고골경골절환자위연구대상，란수표법수궤분성복위내고정조（B조，n＝29）화인공관절치환술（A조，n＝29）2조。기록기술후VAS（동통평분）급Lysholm（슬관절평분）결과。결과：（1）치료후，2조VAS평분결과균교치료전강저（P＜0．05），차A조동통지수강저폭도대우B조（P＜0．05）；（2）치료전，2조슬관절평고정황대비무통계학의의（P＞0．05）；치료후，A조우량솔위79．31％，명현고우B조적48．28％，조간대비차이명현（ P＜0．05）；（3） A조술후생활질량평고BP、MH급GH3항표준균고우B조，대비차이명현（ P＜0．05）。결론：대고골경골절환자행인공관절치환술，료효현저，가조환자진쾌회복슬관절공능、감경통고，치득림상추엄。
Objective:Explore the influence of pain of traumatic orthopedic patients during postoperative and the Lysholm scale with Artificial joint treatment technology Methods:Select 58 cases of patients with femoral neck fracture in our hospital from March 2013 to August 2014 as the research object , with method of random Numbers randomly divided them into reduction and internal fixation group (group B, n =29) and artificial joint replacement group (group A, n =29).Record its postoperative VAS (pain score) and the Ly-sholm (knee score) results.Results:(1) VAS score Results: of two groups after treatment were lower before the treatment (P <0. 05), and reduction of the pain index in group A higher than group B (P <0.05);(2) The contrast of knee joint assessment between two groups before the treatmenthad no statistical significance (P >0.05);After treatment, good rate of group A 79.31%was significant-ly higher than that of the group B 48.28%, the obvious differences between groups (P <0.05);(3) A set of postoperative quality of life assessment three standard BP , MH and GH were higher than group B , differences were statistically significant (P <0.05).Conclu-sion:Patients with femoral neck fracture do artificial joint replacement treatment , curative effect is distinct , can help patients to restore <br> the knee function and pain relief as soon as possible ,is worth of clinical promotion .
