中国实用医药
中國實用醫藥
중국실용의약
CHINA PRACTICAL MEDICAL
2015年
15期
40-42
,共3页
上消化道穿孔%手术治疗%保守治疗%预后
上消化道穿孔%手術治療%保守治療%預後
상소화도천공%수술치료%보수치료%예후
Upper gastrointestinal perforation%Surgical treatment%Conservative treatment%Prognosis
目的：对上消化道穿孔患者经手术措施进行治疗其临床效果情况进行分析探究。方法78例患有上消化道穿孔疾病的患者，将其随机分为对照组及试验组，各39例。对照组给予传统保守方法对患者实施治疗，试验组采用手术治疗方法对患者实施治疗，对比分析患者经不同方法实施治疗的临床治疗效果。结果试验组患者的显效率(61.54%)与对照组患者的显效率(28.21%)相比明显较高，差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。试验组患者总有效率(94.87%)与对照组患者的总有效率(58.97%)相比明显较高，差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论上消化道穿孔患者经手术措施进行治疗其临床效果显著，并且预后情况较好，提高了治疗的安全性，可以在临床上推广。
目的：對上消化道穿孔患者經手術措施進行治療其臨床效果情況進行分析探究。方法78例患有上消化道穿孔疾病的患者，將其隨機分為對照組及試驗組，各39例。對照組給予傳統保守方法對患者實施治療，試驗組採用手術治療方法對患者實施治療，對比分析患者經不同方法實施治療的臨床治療效果。結果試驗組患者的顯效率(61.54%)與對照組患者的顯效率(28.21%)相比明顯較高，差異有統計學意義(P<0.05)。試驗組患者總有效率(94.87%)與對照組患者的總有效率(58.97%)相比明顯較高，差異有統計學意義(P<0.05)。結論上消化道穿孔患者經手術措施進行治療其臨床效果顯著，併且預後情況較好，提高瞭治療的安全性，可以在臨床上推廣。
목적：대상소화도천공환자경수술조시진행치료기림상효과정황진행분석탐구。방법78례환유상소화도천공질병적환자，장기수궤분위대조조급시험조，각39례。대조조급여전통보수방법대환자실시치료，시험조채용수술치료방법대환자실시치료，대비분석환자경불동방법실시치료적림상치료효과。결과시험조환자적현효솔(61.54%)여대조조환자적현효솔(28.21%)상비명현교고，차이유통계학의의(P<0.05)。시험조환자총유효솔(94.87%)여대조조환자적총유효솔(58.97%)상비명현교고，차이유통계학의의(P<0.05)。결론상소화도천공환자경수술조시진행치료기림상효과현저，병차예후정황교호，제고료치료적안전성，가이재림상상추엄。
Objective To analyze and explore the clinical effect and prognosis of surgical treatment of upper gastrointestinal perforation. Methods A total of 78 patients with upper gastrointestinal perforation were randomly divided into control group and experimental group, with 39 cases in each group. The control group received traditional conservative treatment, and the experimental group received surgical treatment. Clinical effects of the two groups were compared and analyzed. Results The experimental group had higher effective rate (61.54%) than that (28.21%), and their difference had statistical significance (P<0.05). The total effective rate was also higher in the experimental group (94.87%) than the control group (58.97%), and their difference had statistical significance (P<0.05). Conclusion Surgical treatment for upper gastrointestinal perforation can provide precise effect and good prognosis. It has good safety in treatment, and is worthy of clinical promotion.
