世界最新医学信息文摘（连续型电子期刊）
世界最新醫學信息文摘（連續型電子期刊）
세계최신의학신식문적（련속형전자기간）
World Latest Medicine Information
2015年
12期
6-7
,共2页
综合护理干预%重症监护病房%感染发生率%控制观察
綜閤護理榦預%重癥鑑護病房%感染髮生率%控製觀察
종합호리간예%중증감호병방%감염발생솔%공제관찰
Comprehensive nursing interventions%Intensive care ward%Incidence of infection%Control and observation
目的：对综合护理干预下重症监护病房内感染发生率的控制效果进行观察。方法：抽取2012年4月~2013年4月在我院就诊的252例患者来作为研究对象，按随机数字表法分为观察组与对照组，各126例；对照组患者给予常规监护护理，观察组患者则给予综合护理干预；对两组患者在院内的感染率及其所感染部位具体的分布情况进行观察分析比较。结果：经过观察和分析发现患者们被感染的主要部位还是在消化道和呼吸道，还有泌尿道这几个部位，目前没有出现死亡的病例，那些经过综合护理干预过后的观察组患者在院内所具有的感染率为4%，而对照组患者的的感染率为20%，两组数据具有明显的差异（P<0.05），有统计学意义。结论：对重症监护病房内的患者实施综合护理干预控制措施能够有效控制病房院内的感染率，对患者病情的恢复具有一定的帮助，因此，值得在临床中推广及使用。
目的：對綜閤護理榦預下重癥鑑護病房內感染髮生率的控製效果進行觀察。方法：抽取2012年4月~2013年4月在我院就診的252例患者來作為研究對象，按隨機數字錶法分為觀察組與對照組，各126例；對照組患者給予常規鑑護護理，觀察組患者則給予綜閤護理榦預；對兩組患者在院內的感染率及其所感染部位具體的分佈情況進行觀察分析比較。結果：經過觀察和分析髮現患者們被感染的主要部位還是在消化道和呼吸道，還有泌尿道這幾箇部位，目前沒有齣現死亡的病例，那些經過綜閤護理榦預過後的觀察組患者在院內所具有的感染率為4%，而對照組患者的的感染率為20%，兩組數據具有明顯的差異（P<0.05），有統計學意義。結論：對重癥鑑護病房內的患者實施綜閤護理榦預控製措施能夠有效控製病房院內的感染率，對患者病情的恢複具有一定的幫助，因此，值得在臨床中推廣及使用。
목적：대종합호리간예하중증감호병방내감염발생솔적공제효과진행관찰。방법：추취2012년4월~2013년4월재아원취진적252례환자래작위연구대상，안수궤수자표법분위관찰조여대조조，각126례；대조조환자급여상규감호호리，관찰조환자칙급여종합호리간예；대량조환자재원내적감염솔급기소감염부위구체적분포정황진행관찰분석비교。결과：경과관찰화분석발현환자문피감염적주요부위환시재소화도화호흡도，환유비뇨도저궤개부위，목전몰유출현사망적병례，나사경과종합호리간예과후적관찰조환자재원내소구유적감염솔위4%，이대조조환자적적감염솔위20%，량조수거구유명현적차이（P<0.05），유통계학의의。결론：대중증감호병방내적환자실시종합호리간예공제조시능구유효공제병방원내적감염솔，대환자병정적회복구유일정적방조，인차，치득재림상중추엄급사용。
Objective:the comprehensive nursing intervention in ICU infection rate under control effects were observed. Meth-ods:extraction in April 2012, April~2013 year in 252 patients of our hospital as a research object, by random number table is divided into study group and control group, 126 patients; Patients in the control group received routine care nursing observation of comprehensive nursing intervention group patients were given;Infection rates of two groups of patients in the hospitals and the site specific analysis compared the distribution of infection. Results: after observation and analysis found patients were was in-fection of main parts also is in digest road and respiratory, also has urinary road this several parts, currently no appeared death of cases, those after integrated nursing intervention after of observation group patients in homes within by has of infection rate for 4%, and control group patients of of infection rate for 20%, two group data has obviously of differences (P<0. 05) , has statis-tics meaning. Conclusions:for patients in intensive care wards carrying out comprehensive nursing intervention measures to ef-fectively control nosocomial infections in wards, the patient has some help in the recovery and, therefore, worthy of promotion and in clinical use.
