中国中医急症
中國中醫急癥
중국중의급증
JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY IN TRADITIONAL CHINESE MEDICINE
2015年
4期
669-671
,共3页
徐顺%王爱丽%陈波%贾卿%黄静%顾耀辉
徐順%王愛麗%陳波%賈卿%黃靜%顧耀輝
서순%왕애려%진파%가경%황정%고요휘
烧伤%休克%中西医%临床观察
燒傷%休剋%中西醫%臨床觀察
소상%휴극%중서의%림상관찰
Burn%Shock%traditional Chinese and western medicine%clinical observation
目的:观察抗休克合剂治疗烧伤休克的临床效果。方法30例重度烧伤休克患者随机分为对照组和治疗组两组各15例。对照组予常规抗休克治疗,治疗组在对照组治疗基础上鼻饲抗休克合剂。观察并记录两组患者复苏前,复苏后24 h、48 h、72 h的血乳酸值、碱剩余,心率、尿量及补液量等体征和临床症状情况。结果治疗组第1个24 h、第2个24 h补液量均低于对照组(均P<0.05);第1个24 h及第2个24 h每小时尿量与对照组相当(P>0.05),但第3个24 h每小时尿量多于对照组(P<0.05)。治疗组在复苏后第1个24 h、第2个24 h及第3个24 h心率改善明显优于对照组(均P<0.05)。两组入院时血乳酸及碱剩余均相近(P>0.05);入院1d、2d及3d治疗组血乳酸值均较对照组明显降低(均P<0.05);而入院1d、2d及3d治疗组碱剩余显著高于对照组(均P<0.01)。结论严重烧伤患者常规液体复苏同时加用抗休克合剂,有利于患者安全渡过休克期,降低死亡率。
目的:觀察抗休剋閤劑治療燒傷休剋的臨床效果。方法30例重度燒傷休剋患者隨機分為對照組和治療組兩組各15例。對照組予常規抗休剋治療,治療組在對照組治療基礎上鼻飼抗休剋閤劑。觀察併記錄兩組患者複囌前,複囌後24 h、48 h、72 h的血乳痠值、堿剩餘,心率、尿量及補液量等體徵和臨床癥狀情況。結果治療組第1箇24 h、第2箇24 h補液量均低于對照組(均P<0.05);第1箇24 h及第2箇24 h每小時尿量與對照組相噹(P>0.05),但第3箇24 h每小時尿量多于對照組(P<0.05)。治療組在複囌後第1箇24 h、第2箇24 h及第3箇24 h心率改善明顯優于對照組(均P<0.05)。兩組入院時血乳痠及堿剩餘均相近(P>0.05);入院1d、2d及3d治療組血乳痠值均較對照組明顯降低(均P<0.05);而入院1d、2d及3d治療組堿剩餘顯著高于對照組(均P<0.01)。結論嚴重燒傷患者常規液體複囌同時加用抗休剋閤劑,有利于患者安全渡過休剋期,降低死亡率。
목적:관찰항휴극합제치료소상휴극적림상효과。방법30례중도소상휴극환자수궤분위대조조화치료조량조각15례。대조조여상규항휴극치료,치료조재대조조치료기출상비사항휴극합제。관찰병기록량조환자복소전,복소후24 h、48 h、72 h적혈유산치、감잉여,심솔、뇨량급보액량등체정화림상증상정황。결과치료조제1개24 h、제2개24 h보액량균저우대조조(균P<0.05);제1개24 h급제2개24 h매소시뇨량여대조조상당(P>0.05),단제3개24 h매소시뇨량다우대조조(P<0.05)。치료조재복소후제1개24 h、제2개24 h급제3개24 h심솔개선명현우우대조조(균P<0.05)。량조입원시혈유산급감잉여균상근(P>0.05);입원1d、2d급3d치료조혈유산치균교대조조명현강저(균P<0.05);이입원1d、2d급3d치료조감잉여현저고우대조조(균P<0.01)。결론엄중소상환자상규액체복소동시가용항휴극합제,유리우환자안전도과휴극기,강저사망솔。
Objective:To observe the clinical effect of anti-shock mixture in the treatment of burn shock. Methods:30 patients of severe burn shock were randomly divided into a treatment group and control group, with 15 patients in each group. All the patients were treated by the same conventional anti-shock treatment,and the treatment group was additionally given nasogastric Kangxiuke mixture. Observe and record patients before re?covery,24,48,72 h after recovery of blood lactic acid,base excess,heart rate,urinary volume and amount of re?hydration and the change of clinical symptoms of two groups were observe and recorded. Results:The experi?mental group blood lactic acid were significantly lower than the control group(P<0.05);Base excess was signifi?cantly higher than control group(P<0.01);The experimental group per hour urine significantly were more than the control group(P<0.05);Heart rate improved significantly better than control group(P<0.05). On the first 24 h in experimental group rehydration and two 24 h rehydration amount was lower than that of the control group (P< 0.05). Conclusion:Severe burn patients conventionalfluid resuscitation of shock with anti-shock mixture at the same time,is conducive to patient safety through the shock stage and reduce the death rate.