国际经济法学刊
國際經濟法學刊
국제경제법학간
2013年
1期
160-172
,共13页
正是那些所谓是与非的讨论,在不断推动着对《鹿特丹规则》研究和认识的深入。从探讨国际货物运输法律制度统一化的角度思考,关于这一公约的各种意见,无论是与非,都值得重视,对制定该公约的经验和教训都应该总结;特别是对它的批评和质疑,更有助于发现问题和探求解决问题的途径,更显得弥足珍贵。
正是那些所謂是與非的討論,在不斷推動著對《鹿特丹規則》研究和認識的深入。從探討國際貨物運輸法律製度統一化的角度思攷,關于這一公約的各種意見,無論是與非,都值得重視,對製定該公約的經驗和教訓都應該總結;特彆是對它的批評和質疑,更有助于髮現問題和探求解決問題的途徑,更顯得瀰足珍貴。
정시나사소위시여비적토론,재불단추동착대《록특단규칙》연구화인식적심입。종탐토국제화물운수법률제도통일화적각도사고,관우저일공약적각충의견,무론시여비,도치득중시,대제정해공약적경험화교훈도응해총결;특별시대타적비평화질의,경유조우발현문제화탐구해결문제적도경,경현득미족진귀。
It is the debate on the so cal ed “right” and“wrong” that con-stantly deepens the research and understanding of Rotterdam Rules.Looking from the perspective of the unification of laws governing international carriage of goods, al comments and arguments about the Rotterdam Rules, whether right or wrong, shal be respected, and al experiences and lessons from formulation of the Rules shal be summarized.Especial y, those criticism and doubt thereon are even more precious, for they could help to find problems and seek ways to solve them.