国际经济法学刊
國際經濟法學刊
국제경제법학간
2013年
4期
182-208
,共27页
近年来,西方学术界出现“有效违约”理论是否可适用于国际贸易法特别是WTO法的争论。本文简要回顾该理论支持者和反对者的不同观点和理由。某些学者基于经济学逻辑支持该想法,其他学者则基于众多理由对此予以批判。本文指出将该理论引进国际法所面临的诸多困难。虽然激烈的争论仍将继续,但对WTO实践不会产生实质性的影响。
近年來,西方學術界齣現“有效違約”理論是否可適用于國際貿易法特彆是WTO法的爭論。本文簡要迴顧該理論支持者和反對者的不同觀點和理由。某些學者基于經濟學邏輯支持該想法,其他學者則基于衆多理由對此予以批判。本文指齣將該理論引進國際法所麵臨的諸多睏難。雖然激烈的爭論仍將繼續,但對WTO實踐不會產生實質性的影響。
근년래,서방학술계출현“유효위약”이론시부가괄용우국제무역법특별시WTO법적쟁론。본문간요회고해이론지지자화반대자적불동관점화이유。모사학자기우경제학라집지지해상법,기타학자칙기우음다이유대차여이비판。본문지출장해이론인진국제법소면림적제다곤난。수연격렬적쟁론잉장계속,단대WTO실천불회산생실질성적영향。
In recent years, there is a debate in western academia circles a-bout whether efficient breach theory could be applied in international trade law, especial y WTO law.This paper gives a brief summary review on different view-points and reasons hold by the supporters and opponents of the theory.While some scholars defend that idea by economic logic, others criticize it on numerous grounds.The paper points out the difficulties of importation of efficient breach theory into international law.Although the heated debate wil continue, it wil not have substantial effects on WTO practice.