CAJ | 학술논문

本文旨在提出通过引进公法方法，来理解与建构国际投资法。第一部分将说明完善国际投资法和仲裁之不足的新概念性方法的必要性。第二部分指出制度上的改革可行性不高，若要增加国际投资关系的可接受性、可靠性以及合法性，最有希望的方法是通过实施系统性的内部方法。第三部分揭示上述方法应当强调：国际投资法本质上为国际公法的一个学科，承认经典国际法与商事仲裁的区别。第四部分提出，通过仲裁庭对以条约为中心的投资保护标准的精心发展与具体化，国际投资仲裁逐渐发展成为一种全球治理机制，对东道国和投资者产生影响。最后在第五部分中，将引入比较公法的方法，旨在指导对国际投资条约的解释并将其合法化，并且把此方法作为改革的来源。
본문지재제출통과인진공법방법，래리해여건구국제투자법。제일부분장설명완선국제투자법화중재지불족적신개념성방법적필요성。제이부분지출제도상적개혁가행성불고，약요증가국제투자관계적가접수성、가고성이급합법성，최유희망적방법시통과실시계통성적내부방법。제삼부분게시상술방법응당강조：국제투자법본질상위국제공법적일개학과，승인경전국제법여상사중재적구별。제사부분제출，통과중재정대이조약위중심적투자보호표준적정심발전여구체화，국제투자중재축점발전성위일충전구치리궤제，대동도국화투자자산생영향。최후재제오부분중，장인입비교공법적방법，지재지도대국제투자조약적해석병장기합법화，병차파차방법작위개혁적래원。
The author suggests taking a public law approach in conceptu-alizing and understanding international investment law. This article provides an in-troduction to the conceptual foundations. In a first step, it points to the reasons why new conceptual approaches are necessary in order to remedy the discontents that have emerged in relation to international investment law and arbitration ( Part I) . Thereafter, this article suggests that, institutional reform not being likely, the most promising avenue to increase acceptance, accountability, and legitimacy in international investment relations is via system-internal approaches ( Part II ) . These approaches should stress the nature of international investment law as a genuinely public law discipline, recognizing differences with classical international law and commercial arbitration ( Part III) . Investment treaty arbitration, thus, in-creasingly develops into a mechanism of global governance with arbitral tribunals crafting and concretizing treaty-overarching standards of investment protection with prospective effects on host states and investors ( Part IV) . Final y, compara-tive public law is introduced as a method for guiding and legitimating the interpre-tation of international investment treaties and as a source of reform ( Part V) .